SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 2566

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. VAIDYANATHAN, A.D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA, JJ.
D. Shanthi - Appellant
Versus
The State Rep By Its, The Commissioner of Police, Chennai & Others - Respondent
HCP.No. 728 of 2022
Decided On : 16-08-2022

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:P. Thiyagaraj, S. Nadhiya, M/S. P. Pugalenthi, Advocates. For the Respondents:M/S. M. Velmurugan, S. Saravanakumaran, Girija Velmurugan, K.S. Elangovan, S. Shanmugam, R.N. Kasiviswathan, S. Archana, V. Sri Ram Counsel, Public Prosecutor, M/S. G. Arivarason, Govardhan, Standing Counsel for Bharathidasan University, C.K. Chandrasekaran, Tamilnadu Bar Counsel, Advocates.

The court emphasized the importance of investigating forged documents, removing a member facing criminal charges from a responsible post in the Bar Council, verifying documents registered by the individual, and restraining encumbrance over the property.

Headnote:

Writ of Habeas Corpus - Illegal Detention - Court directs investigation into forged documents and arrests fake lawyer - Orders Bar Council to remove member facing criminal charges from responsible post - Directs Inspector General of Registration to collect details of documents registered by the individual - Restrains encumbrance over property

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought a Writ of Habeas Corpus to produce his adopted son who was allegedly illegally detained by the respondents. The court was informed of the arrest of a fake lawyer and the involvement of the 3rd and 4th respondents in creating forged documents. The 3rd respondent and others were admitted to the hospital after consuming poison.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the investigation into the forged documents and the arrest of the fake lawyer. It ordered the Bar Council to remove the member facing criminal charges from a responsible post and directed the Inspector General of Registration to collect details of documents registered by the individual. The court also restrained encumbrance over the property.

Issues: Illegal detention, forged documents, involvement of fake lawyer, poisoning incident, removal of member facing criminal charges from Bar Council post, verification of documents registered by the individual, restraining encumbrance over property

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the need to investigate the forged documents and the involvement of the fake lawyer, as well as the importance of removing a member facing criminal charges from a responsible post in the Bar Council. The court also emphasized the verification of documents registered by the individual and the need to restrain encumbrance over the property.

Final Decision: The court directed the investigation into the forged documents and the arrest of the fake lawyer, ordered the Bar Council to remove the member facing criminal charges from a responsible post, directed the Inspector General of Registration to collect details of documents registered by the individual, and restrained encumbrance over the property.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer - To issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus Petition to direct the 2nd respondent to produce my adopted son namely A.P. Dheeraj Maal, 17 Age S/O. Late Pandurangan who is illegally detained in the hands of the respondents 3 and 4, before this Hon’ble Court and hand over the petitioner and set him at Liberty.)

S. Vaidyanathan, J. & A.D. Jagadish Chandira, J.

When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is represented by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor that pursuant to the orders of this Court dated 10.08.2022, the 4th respondent, a fake Lawyer has been arrested on 15.08.2022 and remanded to judicial custody. It is further represented that the Investigation Officer has been taking steps for Police custody of the 4th respondent in order to cull out the truth. It is also represented that during preliminary enquiry, the 3rd respondent and her husband are also hand in glove with the 4th respondent in creating forged documents in respect of the petitioner and others. Further, it was brought to our attention that apprehending arrest, Ramya / 3rd respondent and others have consumed poison and were admitted in the Rajiv Gandhi Government Hospital, Chennai for treatment and they are now out of danger.

2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has pointed out that as directed by this Court, the key has not been handed over to the Assistant Commissioner of Police. The Assistant Commissioner of Police shall collect the keys and hand it over to the petitioner.

3. Upon perusal of one of the documents, namely, Power of Attorney, it is seen that G.Pandurangam, father of the detenue (Aadhar No.2032 2116 7193) is said to have executed a Power of Attorney in favour of one C.Sri Muruga (Aadhar No.6168 1551 8297) who is a Bar Council member and Babu @ Babu Sanjeevi (Aadhar No.2071 5610 7825). During the course of argument, we found that the 4th respondent has also colluded with the said C.Sri Muruga. Therefore, we had instructed Amalraj, Chairman of the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry to be present before this Court. We are also appraised of the fact that there is an order passed by this Court against C.Sri Muruga and police is yet to secure him in obedience to the said order. It also came to light of this Court that C.Sri Muruga is a member of Enrollment Committee and Disciplinary Committee of the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry. It is very unfortunate that a person, who is facing criminal charges is allowed to hold a responsible post in various Committees of the Council, ignoring the fact that this profession alone is regarded as the noblest one, by calling Advocates as Gentlemen.

4. Thiru.Amalraj, Chairman, Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry has stated across the Bar that unanimously, the Members of the Bar Council have decided to remove C.Sri Muruga and Mr.T.Michael Stains Prabhu from the Enrollment Committee and Disciplinary Committee. It was also informed that both of them have already resigned from their respective posts and a meeting is tentatively scheduled to be held on 26.08.2022 for the purpose of selecting fresh persons to the Committees.

5. It is needless to mention that in case of any Advocate, who is a member of the Bar Council, facing a criminal case, he shall not hold such post till he is exonerated from the charges completely by the Appropriate Forum. The Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry is directed to verify the conduct of C.Sri Muruga, whose act comes under the purview of moral turpitude. It is directed that the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry, before permitting an Advocate to hold a significant post in the Statutory Committees, much less Enrollment and Disciplinary Committees, shall verify his/her antecedents without giving any room for such appointments.

6. Further, this Court directs the Inspector General of Registration to communicate all the Sub Registrars' Office situated in the State of Tamil Nadu by way of a Circular, the names of the above persons and collect the details as

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top