SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 2609

S. VAIDYANATHAN, A. D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA
Solamalai – Appellant
Versus
State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Chennai – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:R.C. Paul Kanagaraj, Advocate. For the Respondent: Babu Muthumeeran, Additional Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C. to set aside the judgment of the Sessions Judge, Mahila Court (FAC), Mahalir Needhimandram, Chennai made in S.C.No.244 of 2014 dated 27.10.2017. )

S. Vaidyanathan, J. & A.D. Jagadish Chandira, J.

-Law is in search of proof, not Truth- - Justice M.Srinivasan

The Appeal has been filed seeking to set aside the order dated 27.10.2017 passed by the Sessions Judge, Mahila Court (FAC), Mahalir Needhimandram, Chennai made in S.C.No.244 of 2014.

2. The appellant stands convicted and sentenced as under:-

Legal Provision Sentence
341 IPC One month rigorous imprisonment
302 IPC Life imprisonment with fine of Rs.5000/- in default to undergo a further period of 3 months imprisonment
506(ii) One year rigorous imprisonment

3. Brief facts of the prosecution case:-

i) One M.Sekar, working as Dabethar in Madras Race Club has lodged a complaint, Ex.P1 dated 14.8.2013 to the Inspector of Police, J3 Gunidy Police Station alleging that he is serving as Dabethar for one Aruna, the Additional Secretary in Madras Race Club (the deceased) and on that day in the morning at 10.00 am, he had attended

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top