Back
K. KUMARESH BABU, T. RAJA
State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Department of Industries, Chennai – Appellant
Versus
A. Lenin, Represented by his father & Power Agent Amboiram – Respondent
JUDGMENT
K. Kumaresh Babu, J.
1. The brief facts of the case is that the District Collector, Kancheepuram had issued a notice under Section 3(2) of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997 for acquisition of lands at 121 Vadagal 'B' Village on 23.04.2010. In the said notice, the District Collector had called upon the persons interested in the lands in the schedule to the Notification to submit their objections within a period of 30 days. He had also fixed an enquiry at his Office on 24.05.2010. Pursuant to the enquiry, the Government by G.O.Ms.No.153 Industries (SIPCOT-LA) dated 29.11.2011 had issued the declaration under Section 3(1) Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997. A notice of possession in form “E” was also issued on 15.02.2012. Challenging the said proceedings, the Writ Petition No.8806 of 2012 was filed by the first respondent on the ground that there has been a violation of Section 2(3) & (3) read with Rule 6 (b) & (c) of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997 which confers a valuable right of knowing the cause on which the objections of the landowner is being overruled.
2. The learned Sin
The judgment emphasizes the interpretation of legislative provisions, the power of judicial review, and the authority of the District Collector to conduct hearings, providing clarity on the requisiti....
Procedural adherence in land acquisition is essential; failure to consider objections and conduct enquiries as per statutory rules renders notifications invalid.
Acquisition of land – Hearing of objections – SDO has been conferred powers to act only as Land Acquisition Officer under land acquisition notification – Hearing of objections is a sacrosanct act tre....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the violation of Rule 3(b) of the Rules framed under the Land Acquisition Act can vitiate the acquisition proceedings, emphasizing the importa....
Land acquisition requires a reasoned order following objections under relevant statute.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act was valid as the District Collector, acting within the authority delegated by ....
Timely objections to land acquisition notifications are essential for their consideration under the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
