SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 2713

P. VELMURUGAN
A. Balamurugan – Appellant
Versus
S. Seenivasan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellants:J. Barathan, Advocate. For the Respondent:M. Suresh Kumar, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Appeal Suit is filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure to set aside the Judgment and Decree, dated 19.02.2008 passed by the learned Additional District Judge/Fast Track Court No.II, Tuticorin, in O.S.No.3 of 2006.)

1. This Appeal has been filed to set aside the Judgment and Decree, dated 19.02.2008 passed by the learned Additional District Judge/Fast Track Court No.II, Tuticorin, in O.S.No.3 of 2006.

2. The brief facts of the plaint are as follows:-

The suit properties belonged to the defendants through a Will, by document No.75/1992 dated 23.09.1992. On consent, the defendants have entered into an agreement, on 21.11.2005 with the plaintiff, for selling the suit properties for a total value of Rs.6 lakhs, and on the same day, they have received a sum of Rs.50,000/-, as advance. As per the agreement, the plaintiff has to pay the remaining amount, on or before 30th day of Karthigai month. The defendants have also agreed to sell the suit properties to the plaintiff or his men or an agent of the plaintiff. In the said agreement, Ravikumar and David Pradeep Ravikumar have signed as witnesses. Now also, the plaintiff is ready to purchase the suit prop

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top