SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 2897

R. N. MANJULA
C. Jayanthi – Appellant
Versus
M. Saravanan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:J. Lenin, Advocate. For the Respondent:M.E. Raniselvam, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: First Appeal filed under Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 1 of Civil Procedure Code, praying to set aside the Judgement and Decree dated 12.04.2018 made in OS.No.43 of 2010 on file of the District Court, Thiruvannmalai.)

1. This Appeal suit has been preferred by the defendant / appellant challenging the judgement and decree dated 12.04.2018 passed by the learned District Judge, Thiruvannamlai, made in OS.No.43 2010.

2. The suit was filed by the respondent/plaintiff for the relief of specific performance.

3. Brief facts of the case, as revealed in the plaint and the written statement, are as hereunder:

(i) The defendant, her husband and her father-in-law Mr.N.S Subramanian were the tenants at Door No.10/3, Manakula Vinayagar Street, Thiruvannamalai; the defendant purchased the suit property under a registered sale deed dated 07.02.2007 under document No.340 of 2007 with the money arranged by her father in-law; the defendant was in possession of the vacant site from the date of purchase; since the defendant's father-in-law incurred various debts, he issued two post dated cheques to third parties including one Mr.S.Shankara Vadevelu (Ex-counsellor), for a sum of Rs

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top