SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 2753

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
Akshera Paper, Repd. By Its Factory Manager, R. Senkathir Selvan - Appellant
Versus
Tamil Nadu Generation And Distribution Corporation Limited (Tangedco), Represented By Its Chairman &Managing Director, Chennai & Others - Respondent
W.P. No. 5640 of 2015 & M.P. Nos. 1 & 2 of 2015
Decided On : 08-08-2022

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:R.S. Pandiyaraj, Advocate. For the Respondents:R1 & R2, Abul Kalam, Standing Counsel R3, N. Sivabharathi, Advocate, CGC, R4, No Appearance.

The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Central Electricity Authority (CEA) Regulations, 2007, and the Electricity Act, 2003, only apply to consumers connected to the grid at voltage level of 33kv and above, and not to consumers drawing power below 33 kV.

Headnote:

Harmonics - Electricity Regulations - Central Electricity Authority (Technical Standards for Connectivity to the Grid) Regulations, 2007 - Regulation 3, Section 2(34), Section 2(25), Section 34 of the Electricity Act, 2003 - Clause 3 of Part IV of the CEA Regulations, 2007 - Communication from Chief Engineer (Legal) and Secretary of the Central Electricity Authority

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging the impugned notice by the 2nd respondent regarding harmonic control and levying charges for harmonics dumping from the Petitioner for their HT SC No.102 connected with 11 kV supply line.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the Central Electricity Authority (CEA) Regulations, 2007, and the Electricity Act, 2003, only apply to consumers connected to the grid at voltage level of 33kv and above, and not to consumers drawing power below 33 kV. The court also noted that the CEA had clarified that the regulations for compensation on account of harmonic distortions are applicable only to consumers connected at 33kv or above.

Issues: The main issue was whether the CEA Regulations, 2007, and the Electricity Act, 2003, applied to the petitioner, who was connected to an 11 kV supply line, and whether the impugned demands by the respondent were valid.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the provisions of the CEA Regulations, 2007, and the Electricity Act, 2003, to determine the applicability of the regulations to consumers based on their voltage connection to the grid. The court also considered the communications from the Chief Engineer (Legal) and Secretary of the Central Electricity Authority, which clarified the applicability of the regulations to consumers connected at 33kv or above.

Final Decision: The court quashed the impugned demands and allowed the writ petition, stating that the CEA Regulations, 2007, did not apply to the petitioner, who was connected with 11kv/22kv supply lines. The court also closed the connected miscellaneous petitions.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the 2nd respondent culminating in the impugned notice bearing No.Lr.No.SE/GEDC /AEE.GL/FA/ F.Harmonics/ D.No.700 / 15 dated 20.02.2015 quash the same and forbear the 1st and 2nd Respondents, their men, officers, agents, servants, representatives and/or any one claiming through or under them and/or or any other person from in any manner insisting on harmonic control and levying, demanding and/or collecting charges and compensation for harmonics dumping from the Petitioner for their HT SC No.102 either through the CC Bills or in any other manner who is connected with 11 kV supply line.)

1. The writ petition is filed praying for a Writ of Certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the 2nd respondent culminating in the impugned notice bearing No.Lr.No.SE/ GEDC/ AEE.GL/ FA/ F.Harmonics/ D.No.700/ 15, dated 20.02.2015 and quash the same.

2. The petitioner is connected to 11 kV load level. It is thus submitted that Part IV of Central Electricity Authority (Technical Standards for Connectivity to the Grid) Regulations, 2007 [hereinafter referred to as "CEA Regulation"] is not applicable, for the same would apply only to consumers availing supply at voltage of 33 kV or above and not to consumers drawing power below 33 kV.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents in unison submitted that the issue raised in the present writ petition stands covered by the judgment of this Court in W.P.No.25 of 2015 [M/s.S.Palaniyandi Mudaliar Memorial Hospital vs. TANGEDCO] dated 05.06.2017, wherein this Court was pleased to pass the following orders, the relevant portions of which is extracted hereunder:

"24. In view of the above, since the harmonics have several undesirable effects and affects power quality, on 21.02.2007, the Central Electricity Authority (CEA) introduced a new Regulation and accordingly, its Technical Standards for Connectivity to the Grid Regulations, 2007, came for enforcement. Applicability of the Regulations is provided in Regulation 3, which reads as under:

3. Applicability of the Regulations These Regulations shall be applicable to all the users, requesters, Central Transmission Utility and State Transmission Utility.

It is clear from the above that the said Regulation is applicable only to four categories, namely, Users, Requesters, Central Transmission Utility and State Transmission Utility.

25. In this context, let me find out the meaning given under the CEA Regulations, 2007, for Users and Requesters. Section 2(34) defines the meaning of User, which is given as under:~

2(34)-- User means a person such as, a Generating Company including captive generating plant or Transmission Licensee (other than the Central Transmission Utility and State Transmission Utility) or Distribution Licensee or Bulk Consumer, whose electrical plant is connected to the grid at voltage level 33kv and above.

Section 2(25) defines the meaning of "Requester", which is given as under:~

2(25)~~ Requester means a person, such as a Generating Company including captive generating plant or Transmission Licensee (excluding Central Transmission Utility and State Transmission Utility) or Distribution Licensee or Bulk Consumer, who is seeking connection of his new or expanded electrical plant to the Grid at voltage level 33kv and above.

A conjoint reading of the above said provisions show that a person such as, Generating Company including captive generating plant or Transmission Licensee or Distribution Licensee or Bulk Consumer, whose electrical plant is connected to the grid at voltage level 33 kv and above. Therefore, it is clear that the above said Regulations are applicable to only those consumers whose electrical plant is connected to the Grid at the voltage level of 33kv and above, hence, the petitioners, who are connected to the Grid at voltage

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top