Back
N. SATHISH KUMAR
Kumar Praveen Mehta – Appellant
Versus
State rep by, Inspector of Police, Chennai – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records connected with the CC No 4 of 2022, pending on the file of the Court, Land Grabbing Court II Allikulam Court Complex, Chennai-3 and to quash the same.)
1. This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.4 of 2022, on the file of the Special Court No.II for Exclusive Trial of Land Grabbing Cases, Allikulam, Chennai, for offence under Sections 420, 465, 468, 471 r/w 120(b) of IPC.
2. The petitioner is the 2nd accused in C.C.No.4 of 2022 on the file of the Special Court No.II for Exclusive Trial of Land Grabbing Cases, Allikulam, Chennai. The case of the 2nd respondent/defacto complainant emanates from the sequence of events narrated below. The 2nd respondent's father Dr.Rama Pandiyaraj was the original owner of the property measuring 1.04 acres, out of which 2 grounds and 1613 sq.ft. is the area in dispute. The 2nd respondent in his complaint, dated 02.04.2012 with the Commissioner of Police, Egmore has alleged that A3 along with one Kantha Praveen Mehta/A1 and Kumar Praveen Mehta/petitioner/A2 conspired and fabricated document
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the elements of forgery, cheating, and conspiracy must be clearly established to prosecute an individual under the Indian Penal Code.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the court should not quash proceedings based on the validity of evidence at the Section 482 Cr.P.C stage, and the allegations in the complaint....
The court emphasized the limitations of exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C and highlighted that the High Court cannot delve into the disputed question of facts while considerin....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that for an offence of forgery, there must be a false document or electronic record, and the prosecution must demonstrate the elements of forgery a....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of legal principles in determining the existence of a prima facie case and the absence of grave suspicion against the accused in fr....
The court emphasized the distinction between civil disputes and criminal offences, quashing the FIR due to lack of criminal intent in the allegations.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
