SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Pat) 1146

JITENDRA KUMAR
Ankur Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Binod Kumar Singh.
For the State : Mr. Upendra kumar, APP.
For the Opp. Party No. 2 : Mr. Ranjit Choubey.

Jitendra Kumar, J. – The present petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. has been preferred to quash the impugned order dated 02.09.2015, and all the criminal proceedings arising out of the same, passed by Ld. S.D.J.M, Danapur, Patna, whereby Ld. SDJM has taken cognizance of offence punishable under Section 323, 380, 452, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code has been taken against all the Petitioners and has directed issuance of summons against them.

2. The gist of the allegation as emerging from the complaint is that one Poonam Kumari, wife of the complainant, had got a piece of land measuring 2 acre and 33 decimal in the village Purainia by way of registered gift deed bearing no. 5229/5094/1995 dated 01.09.1995 and after the death of the said Poonam Kumari, the Complainant-Husband got the mutation of the land in his own name and he was regularly paying land revenue to the government and he was in possession of the property. It is further alleged that he has also got some land from his ancestral property after partition amongst his brothers and he was in possession of the same. However, it is alleged that with an intent to grab this property, the accused no. 3, 4, 5, an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top