Back
R. VIJAYAKUMAR
N. Kamala – Appellant
Versus
Post Master, Head Post Office, Thanjavur – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: This Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandmus, calling for records relating to the impugned sanction order issued by the first respondent in LA1/SBC-20/09-10 dated 21.05.2009 and quash the same and direct the respondents to pay the entire accrued amount in the KMB PPF A/c.No.1161 as per the entries with subsequent interest.)
1. The present writ petition has been filed challenging an order passed by the first respondent herein under which the PPF account operated by the writ petitioner's husband was closed without any interest on the ground that it is an irregular account.
2. The petitioner in her affidavit has contended that her husband late.M.Narayanan belonged to a business family and he was engaged in the business of Timber and Tiles under the name and style of 'V.Mahadeva Iyer and Sons'. The said M.Narayanan had started his own business in the year 1969. In the same year, there was a partition and a separate Hindu undivided family smaller status was created for the said M.Narayanan after verification of the Assessing Officer of the Income Tax Department as contemplated under Section 171 of the Income
Belated refusal of irregular PPF deposits after years of acceptance entitles payment of due interest.
Rule 17 of Post Office Savings Bank General Rules, 1981, would apply only when an applicant is irregularly allowed something more than what is contemplated under a scheme.
The court ruled that PPF accounts for minors should be treated separately post-majority, emphasizing beneficial interpretations of statutory provisions.
Notification changes to the Public Provident Fund scheme do not retroactively affect accounts opened prior, especially when respondents failed to inform account holders of the amendments.
(1) Statutory duty upon the Petitioner Bank to return the deposited money in the PF Account of HUF on maturity.(2) Bank acted in gross violation by not complying with statutory duty as per rules/laws....
The court's decision was based on the discrepancy in the accounts mentioned in the communication from the revenue department and the PPF account referred to in the writ petition, leading to the direc....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
