Back
ABDUL QUDDHOSE
C. H. Vijaya Sekhar – Appellant
Versus
Director of Teacher Education, Chennai – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of Certiorarified Mandams to call for the records pertaining to the order passed by the 2nd respondent in Na.Ka.No.905/Aa1/2019 dated 03.08.2019 and quash the same and direct the respondents to settle the terminal benefits and consequent pensionary benefits to the petitioner, by considering the petitioner's representations dated 20.09.2018 and 18.02.2019.)
1. This writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 03.08.2019 passed by the second respondent rejecting the petitioner's request for settlement of his terminal benefits and consequential pensionary benefits. The brief facts leading to the filing of this writ petition are as follows:-
2. The petitioner passed +2 examination in Andhra Pradesh. He joined Teacher Training Course during the year 1983-1984 at Sanjay Gandhi Teacher Training Institute, Chebroal, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. After completion of the course, certificates were issued to the petitioner in January 1997 and according to the petitioner, he secured 50% of marks in the Teacher Training Course and based on the certificate possessed by him, he was app
The central legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement to terminal benefits upon superannuation and the consideration of contributions made by the petitioner during his service.
The main legal point established is the entitlement to provisional pension in the context of suspension, superannuation, and pending criminal proceedings, as per relevant rules and government orders.
The court emphasized the importance of considering the proposal for approval of appointment based on prescribed norms and rules, despite the inoperative government order.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of an employee to salary and retiral benefits based on the regularization of their entire service period, supported by documented e....
The petitioner was not entitled to regularization of service from 01.01.2006 onwards due to government policy and lack of compliance with minimum service period for pension eligibility.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
