SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 3258

P. T. ASHA
Kolanchi – Appellant
Versus
S. Chandirasekar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:P. Mani, Advocate. For the Respondents:R2, D. Bhaskaran, Advocates.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and award dated 30.09.2011 passed in M.C.O.P.No.85 of 2008 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Sub Court), Perambalur, insofar as the same are against the appellant, and for enhancement of compensation.)

1. The 1st petitioner before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Perambalur in M.A.C.T.O.P.No.85 of 2008 are the appellants before this Court seeking enhancement of the Award passed in the above claim petition.

2. The parties, for ease of understanding, are referred to in the same ranking as before the Tribunal.

3. The petitioners are the son and daughters of one Palaniammal, who had died in a road accident on 29.03.2006. The petitioners would submit that their mother who was aged 62 years at the time of the accident was an agricultural coolie, earning a monthly income of Rs.2,000/-. On the said date, when she was walking on the road in a West-East direction, the lorry belonging to the first respondent and insured with the second respondent, bearing Registration No.TN 30 K 7231, which was driven in a rash and negligent manner hit the deceased pedestri









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top