IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. NIRMAL KUMAR, J.
Dr. Sudha Vetrivendan - Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by its Inspector of Police, Vepery & Another - Respondent
Crl. O.P. No. 30220 of 2018 & Crl. M.P. No. 17756 of 2018
Decided On : 22-09-2022
Passport Act - Quashing of FIR - Section 12(1A)(a) of the Indian Passport Act - [12(1A)(a)] - The court discussed the provisions of the Indian Passport Act, particularly Section 12(1A)(a), and emphasized the voluntary surrender of the passport, the acceptance of surrender certificate, and the payment of penalty as deemed condonation, leading to the quashing of the FIR.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, born in Malaysia to Indian parents, obtained an Indian passport by suppressing her Malaysian nationality. Upon realizing the mistake, she voluntarily surrendered the passport, paid the penalty, and had her passport cancelled. Despite this, an FIR was registered against her under Section 12(1A)(a) of the Indian Passport Act.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner's voluntary surrender of the passport, acceptance of surrender certificate, and payment of penalty amounted to deemed condonation. It concluded that continuation of the FIR would be an abuse of process of law.
Issues: The issues revolved around the petitioner's acquisition of Indian passport, subsequent surrender, and the registration of the FIR under Section 12(1A)(a) of the Indian Passport Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the voluntary surrender of the passport, acceptance of surrender certificate, and payment of penalty as deemed condonation, leading to the quashing of the FIR.
Final Decision: The Criminal Original Petition was allowed, and the FIR in Crime No.244 of 2018 against the petitioner was quashed.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the entire records and quash the FIR in Crime No.244/2018 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch (CCB)-I, Team-32, Chennai.)
1. This petition has been filed to call for the entire records and quash the FIR in Crime No.244/2018 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch (CCB)-I, Team-32, Chennai.
2. The petitioner/accused in Crime No.244 of 2018 for offence under Section 12(1A)(a) of the Indian Passport Act has filed this quash application
3. The gist of the case is that on 02.01.2018, a complaint, received from the Regional Passport Officer addressed to the Commissioner of Police, Chennai stating that the petitioner applied for Indian Passport during 2004 by furnishing her 10th mark sheet, degree certificate and ration card, she had declared in her passport application that she is an Indian by birth. The undertaking given by the petitioner in column 17 of the passport application is “I owe allegiance to the sovereignty, unity and integrity of India and have not voluntarily acquired the citizenship or travel travel document of another country, I have not surrendered or been deprived of citizenship of India. The information given by me is true and I am sole responsible for its accuracy. I am aware that it is an offence under the Passport Act, 1967 to furnish any false information or to suppress any material information with a view to obtaining passport or any other travel document”. Thereafter, on receipt of police verification report on 14.10.2004, Passport bearing No.F1046654 dated 10.12.2004 was issued to the petitioner. The petitioner applied for reissue of passport No.F1046654 dated 10.12.2004 in the year 2014 under Tatkal scheme and thereafter, the same was renewed. The petitioner again approached the passport office in the year 2016 for surrender of Indian Passport, wherein she admitted that for obtaining Indian Passport (for the first time in 2004 and re-issue in 2014), she suppressed her Malaysian nationality and thereafter a penalty of Rs.1,05,000/- was imposed and surrender certificate issued to the petitioner. Recording these facts, a complaint lodged and a case got registered.
4. The contention of the petitioner is that the petitioner was born in Malaysia in the year 1965. The petitioner’s parents are Indian citizens, but at the time of petitioner's birth they were in Malaysia. Petitioner by birth acquired Malaysian citizenship. Thereafter, she moved along with her parents to India. She did her schooling in the year 1981 in India. After completion of schooling, she joined Government Dental College and completed Bachelor’s in Dental Surgery (BDS) course. During the year 1993, she married a fellow Doctor and thereafter, she is living in Chennai along with her Son. In the year 1994, the Malaysian passport was renewed, which got expired in the year 2003. Thereafter, she was advised to apply for Indian passport, since her parents are Indians and she has been living throughout in India except her birth in Malaysia. There is no relationship or connection in Malaysia. Since, she is an Indian in all aspects she applied for Indian passport in the year 2004. Thereafter got renewed in the year 2014. Later, she came to know that holding of two passports is not proper. Hence, she approached the passport authority to surrender her Malaysian passport. At that time, the authorities informed that she cannot surrender Malaysian Passport in India. She can only surrender Indian Passport, accepting the same, she surrendered her Indian Passport, and a penalty was levied. On 29.08.2016, a sum of Rs.5,000/- levied for suppressing place of birth and a sum of Rs.50,000/- for making application for passport by suppression of information about nationality and additional penalty of Rs.50,000/- has been levied for travelling more than 5 times on Indian Passport after obtaining foreign nationality. T
The voluntary surrender of a passport, acceptance of surrender certificate, and payment of penalty can be deemed as condonation, leading to the quashing of an FIR under the Indian Passport Act.
Pending criminal case mandates short validity passport under Passports Act despite exemption from appearance.
Point of Law : No fault can be found with the 1st respondent issuing notice under Section 12(1)(b) of the Act, directing surrender of passport which had admittedly been obtained by suppressing involv....
Court may permit fresh passport application after surrender of prior passports obtained by false declaration and payment of penalty.
The court emphasized the importance of disclosing ongoing criminal proceedings when applying for passport issuance, balancing the rights of the accused with the integrity of the trial process.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.