SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 3479

N. SATHISH KUMAR
Rajamanickam – Appellant
Versus
Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu, Chennai – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:S. Manoharan, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1 to R6, S. Ravikumar, Special Government Pleader.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to take appropriate action against the Doctors and other persons responsible for the death of petitioner's wife and child in the womb and also to direct the respondents to pay compensation of Rs.30 lakhs to the petitioner as a relief to loss his wife and child in the womb.)

1. This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to take appropriate action against the Doctors and other persons, who are responsible for the death of his wife and child in the womb and also to direct the respondents to pay Rs.30 lakhs as compensation.

2. This Court, by an order, dated 26/2/2021, has passed the following order:-

The Petitioner seeks compensation for the death of his wife, who had been admitted at the Kudavasal Government Hospital in connection with her pregnancy.

2. The facts of this case are undoubtedly tragic. While at the Kudavasal Government Hospital, the Petitioner's wife developed complications and was shifted to multiple hospitals such as the Tiruvarur Medical College and Hospital and the Thanjavur Government Hospital. E

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top