Back
G. JAYACHANDRAN
David – Appellant
Versus
State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Chennai – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 374 of Cr.P.C., to set aside the judgment passed in S.C.No.301 of 2011 dated 05.03.2013 on the file of Mahila Court, Chennai.)
1. This appeal against conviction for offence under Section 376 of I.P.C. The appellant was sentenced to undergo 10 years R.I and fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default, to undergo 6 months S.I.
2. The case of the prosecution is that, on 28.01.2010, at about 10.30 a.m., the appellant herein called P.W.1 to his house and had forcibly intercourse with her. P.W.4, who is the sister of P.W.1 came in search of her sister and enquired the appellant. P.W.4 noticed the appellant found perturbed and disturbed. She saw her sister P.W.1 inside the accused house in disorderliness. P.W.1 informed that, she was raped by the appellant. Immediately, P.W.4 called her mother (P.W.2) and thereafter, along with her cousin (P.W.3) went to the police station and gave complaint (Ex.P.1). The police took up the investigation, arrested the appellant on the same day. The wearing dress of the victim and the accused were collected and same were sent for Forensic lab for test. Both the P.W.1 and the appellant were sent for medical examinat
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for reliable and corroborated evidence in grave charges, emphasizing the degree of proof necessary in such cases.
The prosecution failed to prove charges of gang rape beyond a reasonable doubt due to inconsistent testimony and lack of corroborating evidence, emphasizing the necessity for proper identification pr....
The quality of evidence and the requirement of 'sterling' quality in establishing the elements of the offence.
Testimonial inconsistencies and lack of corroboration undermine a conviction for rape, especially when based solely on a victim's testimony.
The sufficiency of solitary evidence in cases of sexual offences and the requirement for consistency and trustworthiness in such testimony.
The prosecution failed to prove the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to inconsistent testimony and an unexplained delay in filing the complaint, resulting in the reversal of the conviction....
The court affirmed that the victim's testimony, corroborated by medical evidence, is sufficient for conviction in rape cases, even with minor inconsistencies.
Kidnapping and rape – Reliance on emotional state of victim as a proxy for corroboration of allegations would be both legally unsound and procedurally inappropriate.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that consent under fear or misconception is essential to establish the offence of rape, and the court's analysis of the victim's consent and act....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
