SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 3166

R. HEMALATHA
Rajesh – Appellant
Versus
Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Villupuram – Respondent


Advocates appeared: For the Appellant :S. Sathia Chandran, Advocate. For the Respondent: S. Sugendran, Additional Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 372(2) of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 against the judgment dated 15.12.2021, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethimandram (Fast Track Mahila Court), Villupuram. in S.C.No.24 of 2018.)

1. This criminal appeal is filed against the judgment dated 15.12.2021, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethimandram (Fast Track Mahila Court), Villupuram. in S.C.No.24 of 2018.

2. The appellant is the accused in S.C.No.24/2018 and he is convicted and sentenced as detailed hereunder:

Conviction

Sentence

Section 376 r/w 90 IPC

Rigorous Imprisonment for 7 years and a fine of Rs.25,000/-, in default, to undergo Simple Imprisonment for three months.

3. In order to bring home the guilt of the accused, the prosecution examined 9 witnesses and marked 8 documents.

4. The case of the prosecution as could be discerned from the prosecution witnesses is as follows:

4.1. Divya (P.W.1) is the daughter of Lalitha (P.W.2) and Balan (P.W.3). P.W.1 to P.W.3 are residing in Olliyampalayam Village, Ulundur

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top