SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 267

S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
Rahmadulla – Appellant
Versus
Shakila – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. N. Selvaraj.

ORDER :

Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to call for the records on the file of Judicial Magistrate I, Puducherry, in D.V.C.No.70/2020 and quash the proceedings therein in so far as the petitioners are concerned.

The Civil Revision Petition is filed to quash DVC No.70 of 2022 pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate-I, Puducherry.

2. The 1st respondent is the complainant and the 2nd respondent is the husband of the first respondent.

3. The learned counsel for the revision petitioners state that the revision petitioners were unnecessarily implicated in the DVC Proceedings, despite the fact that they are no way connected with the allegations.

4. As far as the revision petition filed to quash the DVC Proceedings are concerned, the allegations set out in the complaint is to be considered and in the present case, the application under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 filed by the first respondent reveals that certain serious allegations are raised against the revision petitioners and it is specifically stated that they are living in a joint family. When the parties are living in the joint fami

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top