SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 268

S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
A. Balasubramanian – Appellant
Versus
R. Aruchamy Gounder – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. K. Govi Ganesan.
For the Respondents: Mr. S. Mukunth Senior Counsel for M/s. Sarvabhauman Associates.

JUDGMENT :

The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Appeal Suit. In this regard, the learned counsel for the appellant has sent a letter to the Registry, High Court of Madras on 14.12.2022.

2. The learned counsel for the appellant has also made an endorsement in the case bundle to withdraw the present Appeal Suit.

3. Based on the letter and recording the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the appellant to withdraw the appeal suit, the Appeal Suit stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top