S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
Clara – Appellant
Versus
Vanitha – Respondent
ORDER :
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the Fair and Decreetal Order dated 18.08.2022 in I.A.No.93 of 2018 in R.C.O.P.No.34 of 2015 in the Court of the Rent Controller & District Munsif at Ootacamund.
The Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the Fair and Decreetal Order dated 18.08.2022 in I.A.No.93 of 2018 in R.C.O.P.No.34 of 2015 in the Court of the Rent Controller & District Munsif at Ootacamund.
2. The revision petitioner is the tenant and the respondent/landlord instituted a proceedings for eviction under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control Act) 1960. The Rent Control Original Proceedings in R.C.O.P.No.34 of 2015 was filed by the respondent/landlord on the ground that the husband of the revision petitioner Late Mr. Munian was the tenant originally and he died on 20.04.2015, leaving behind the revision petitioner and her children. Thus, the revision petitioner inherited the tenancy through her husband Late Sri. Munian. The respondent/landlord purchased the Schedule property through Sale Deed dated 04.10.2013 from Mr. P. Singaram, S/o. Late P. Ponnabalam and Smt. Bagam, W/
The court emphasized the importance of consistent statements and timely proceedings in rent control cases, and recognized the landlords' genuine need for additional accommodation.
The High Court may exercise its revisional jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution to impose conditions, such as the payment of rent arrears, upon a litigating party to ensure the expediti....
Sufficient cause is sine qua non for condonation of delay; mercy or equity cannot substitute statutory requirement.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.