KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
S. Krishnamoorthy, Proprietor, Sriram Engineering Company, Chennai – Appellant
Versus
Engineering Projects India Limited, Represented by its Executive Director, Chennai – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Common Prayer: Original Petition filed under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to appoint an independent sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes arising between the petitioner and the respondent pursuant to the work order Nos.SRO/PMD/683/041 dated 06.05.2013, SRO/PMD/686/044 & SRO/PMD/686/045 both dated 19.06.2013 respectively and Clause 76 of the General Conditions of Contract for the appointment of sole Arbitrator and to direct the respondents to pay the cost of this petition.)
Common Order:
1. These petitions have been filed under Section 11(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, (hereinafter referred as “the Act”), seeking to appoint an independent sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes arising between the petitioner and the respondent pursuant to the work order Nos.SRO/PMD/683/041 dated 06.05.2013, SRO/PMD/686/044 & SRO/PMD/686/045 both dated 19.06.2013 respectively and Clause 76 of the General Conditions of Contract for the appointment of sole Arbitrator and to direct the respondent to pay the cost of this petition.
2. Both the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties would submit that the present dispute is arising ou
Perkins Eastman Architects DPC and Ors. vs. HSCC (India) Ltd.
The main legal point established is that the appointment of an arbitrator must be in accordance with the law and the parties' written consent, and the court has the authority to appoint an arbitrator....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the ineligibility of the appointed arbitrator under Section 12(5) read with Schedule VII of the Arbitration Act and the requirement for a panel of ....
The court's authority to appoint an arbitrator in cases where the parties are unable to agree, in accordance with the law laid down by the Supreme Court and the provisions of the Arbitration & Concil....
Appointment of arbitrator by designation is permissible. Arbitration clauses in government contracts providing that an employee of the department will be the sole arbitrator are neither void nor unen....
The main legal point established is the necessity of appointing an independent arbitrator to resolve disputes, in accordance with the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and rele....
The right to appoint an arbitrator is not forfeited by serving notice for appointment; jurisdictional interventions can temporarily affect appointment rights, and the court's role is to ensure compli....
Whatever advantage a party may derive by nominating an arbitrator of its choice would get counter balanced by equal power with the other party. But, in a case where only one party has a right to appo....
Point of Law : Whatever advantage a party may derive by nominating an arbitrator of its choice would get counter balanced by equal power with the other party. But, in a case where only one party has ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.