SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 560

N. SATHISH KUMAR
Mathivanan – Appellant
Versus
Deivanai (Died) – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:P. Thiagarajan, Advocate. For the Respondents:R3, R8, R9, R11 to R19, V.K. Vijayaraghavan, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(PRAYER: This Appeal Suit is filed under Section 96 of C.P.C. against the judgment and decree of the learned Sub Judge, Pattukottai, dated 14.02.1991 made in O.S.No.55 of 1987.)

1. Aggrieved over the dismissal of the suit in respect of ''A'' schedule property and item Nos.1 and 2 of ''B'' schedule property, the plaintiff has filed the present appeal.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to herein, as per their rank before the Trial Court.

3. The brief facts, leading to the filing of this Appeal, are as follows:-

    3.1. The suit properties are joint family property of the plaintiff''s father consisting of the plaintiff and his father one Singaram. The first defendant is the mother of the plaintiff and the wife of the said Singaram. Second defendant is the mother of Singaram i.e., paternal grandmother of the plaintiff. Defendants 3 and 4 are purchaser of the ''A'' schedule properties. Defendants 5 to 9 were impleaded as legal heirs of the third defendant in the suit. It is the case of the plaintiff that his father Singaram was addicted to alcohol and he was leading a wayward life. He never cared for the welfare of the plaintiff, who was minor at th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top