SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 568

S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
K. Marimuthu – Appellant
Versus
Secretary to Government, Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Economic Affairs, New Delhi – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:No Appearance. For the Respondents:R1 & R2, M. Arvind Kumar, Senior Panel Counsel, R3, T. Poornam, R4 & R5, No Appearance, R6 & R16, V. Kalyana Raman for M/s. Aiyar & Dolia, R7, G. Sasee Dhevi, R10, F.B. Benjamin George, R11, S. Pramila for M/s. PMR Associates, R12, S. Kesavan, R13, R27 to R30, Mohandas, R14 & R31, Sethuraman, R17, T. Thirupura Sundari, R18, M/s. Mutrthy and Vasan, R20, Y. Jyothish Chander, R21, T. Hemalatha, R22, Srinath Sridevan, Senior Counsel, T.K. Bhaskar, R23, M. Muthuperiyasamy, R24, P.S. Ramesh, R25, R. Imayavaramban, for M/s. Ramalingan & Associates, R33, K. Balamurali for M/s. Shivakumar and Suresh, R34, A. Ilangovan, Advocates, R8, R9, R15, R19, R26 & R32, Not Ready in Notice.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the entire files pertaining to the impugned proceedings issued by the 3rd respondent herein in No DBOD.No.inf.BC.48/11.01.009/2006-07 dated 18th December 2006 specifically in concern with the withdrawn of the Sl.No.35 of the circular therein in connection with the circular No DBOD No. BP. BC. 62/C. 469(W)-91 dated 4th January 1991 and quash the very same Sl.No.35 of the said circular alone as arbitrary, irrelevant, unreasonable, and violative of Art. 14, 15 and clause (1), (4), (4-A) of Art.16 of the Constitution of India and Consequently direct the 7th to 34th respondents to conduct survey on the available Panel of advocates of their Bank at present and report the SC/ST/OBC advocates out of the available strength at present with its percentage of each category wise advocates in all India level / State level / Region level / Zonal level according to their administrative structure and consequently direct the 7 to 34 respondents and ot








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top