SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 812

R. VIJAYAKUMAR
Poominathan – Appellant
Versus
Saraswathi – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant :Niranjan S. Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondent: No Appearance.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal filed under Section 28 of Hindu Marriage Act read with Section 100 of C.P.C, to set aside the judgement and decree dated 22.01.2013 in C.M.A.No.16 of 2011 on the file of the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli confirming the fair and decreetal order passed in H.M.O.P.No.24 of 2007 dated 07.06.2011 on the file of Subordinate Court, Ambasamudram and allow this second appeal.)

1. The appeal has been filed by the husband challenging the concurrent findings of the trial Court as well as the Appellate Court wherein his prayer for divorce has been rejected.

2. The husband has filed a divorce petition contending that he got married with the respondent on 01.06.1984 and after marriage while the couple were living in Mumbai, the wife has exhibited bad character. The wife came to her parental house for delivery in which a girl child was born. The said child had passed away in 15 days. The wife wanted to be at Ambasamudram for some more time in order to get out of the grief due to death of the child. However, while she was in Ambasamudram, she developed illicit intimacy with one Jayaraman and the said Jayaraman has addressed severa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top