S. S. SUNDAR, N. SENTHILKUMAR
Global Waste Recyclers Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Government of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the legal grounds for the writ petitions are premised on whether lands under reservation have been acquired within statutory timelines. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. the appropriateness of government regulations in restricting land use under public health and welfare has been scrutinized by the court. (Para 27 , 29) |
| 3. land classification as a catchment area must adhere to statutory acquisition requirements. (Para 97) |
ORDER :
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of certiorari calling for the records of the 1st respondent in issued Letter No. 24801/UD-VII(1)/2016-3 dated 26.04.2017 and quash the same in lands comprised to an extent 1.21 acres in S.Nos.126/1B, 1B1, 295/2B2, B2 at Alamathi Village, Ponneri Taluk, Thiruvallore High Road, Redhills, Thiruvallur District having automatically deemed to have been released from reservation as catchment area under Section 38 (b) of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971.
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the 1st respondent in issuing Letter No. 24801/UD-V
Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay Vs. Dr. Hakimwadi Tenants Association and Others
Narmada Bachao Andolan and Others Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and Others
Narmada Bachao Andolan Vs. Union of India and Others
Nirmal Jeet Kaur v. State of M.P. (2004) 7 SCC 558 : 2004 SCC (Cri) 1989
Pallawi Resources Ltd. Vs. Protos Engineering Company Pvt. Ltd. 2010 (5) SCC 196
Pillayar P.K.V.K.N. Trust Vs. Karpaga N.N.U.S. 2010 (9) SCC 344
Prakash R. Gupta Vs. Lonawala Municipal Corporation
Raju S. Jethmalani and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others
RBI V. Peerless General Finance and Investment Co. Ltd. 1987 (1) SCC 424
Shrirampur Municipal Council, Shrirampur Vs. Satyabhamabai Bhimaji Dawkher and Others
Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra
State of H.P. v. Rajkumar Brijender Singh
State of Haryana v. Dharam Singh
State of M.P. vs. Vishnu Prasad Sharma
State of Mysore Vs. H. Sanjeeviah
State of Orissa Vs. Government of India and Others
State of Rajasthan v. Basant Nahata
State of U.P. and Others Vs. Manohar
State of U.P. v. Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd. (1991) 4 SCC 139
State of W.B. v. Kesoram Industries Ltd. (2004) 10 SCC 201
Subhash Chandra and Others Vs. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board and Others
Union of India v. West Coast Paper Mills Ltd. (2004) 2 SCC 747
V. Kishan Rao Vs. Nikhil Super Speciality Hospital and Others
V. Nagamani and Mrs. Soundara Devi Vs. The Director of Town and Country Planning
V. Nagamani and Mrs. Soundara Devi Vs. The Director of Town and Country Planning and Another
Association of Vasanth Apartments' Owners Vs. V. Gopinath and Others
Balram Kumawat v. Union of India
Bhavnagar University Vs. Palitana Sugar Mills Pvt. Ltd. and Others
Bishambhar Dayal Chandra Mohan and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others
CCE vs. Orient Fabrics (P) Ltd. (2004) 1 SCC 597
Chairman, Indore Vikas Pradhikaran Vs. Pure Industrial Coke and Chemicals Limited and Others
Coffee Board, Karnataka, Bangalore Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Karnataka and Others
Distributors (Baroda) (P) Ltd. vs. Union of India
Govt. of Karnataka v. Gowramma
Himat Lal K. Shah Vs. Commissioner of Police, Ahmedabad and Another
Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. v. Darius Shapur Chenai
Hotel Balaji v. State of A.P. 1993 Supp (4) SCC 536 : AIR 1993 SC 1048
In Re: Ministry of Information & Broadcasting
India Cement Ltd. v. State of T.N. (1990) 1 SCC 12 : AIR 1990 SC 85
Indian Handicrafts Emporium and Others Vs. Union of India and Others
Indore Vikas Pradhikaran Vs. Pure Industrial Coke and Chemicals Limited
J. Amsaveni Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Others
Jilubhai Nanbhai Khachar v. State of Gujarat
K.T. Plantation Private Limited and Another Vs. State of Karnataka
Khub Chand vs. State of Rajasthan
Maharao Sahib Shri Bhim Singhji Vs. Union of India and Others
Mamleshwar Prasad v. Kanhaiya Lal
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the State has the power to regulate land development to protect the environment and water sources, and the petitioner's right to property was ....
Environmental protection of water catchment areas trumps property rights; prior binding precedent upheld over erroneous per incuriam declaration.
Prior development permissions granted under repealed rules remain valid despite subsequent regulatory changes, and cannot be revoked retroactively by new laws.
Review jurisdiction is limited to correcting apparent errors and cannot serve as an appeal; land reserved for public purposes under the prior act remains non-alienable unless specific actions under t....
Failure to acquire land within three years from publication of a development plan results in deemed release from reservation under Section 38 of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1971.
Land reserved under planning laws is deemed released if not acquired within three years, as per Section 38 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.