Gopalsamy Jayaraman (died) vs Kothandaraman

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Mad) 932

G. K. ILANTHIRAIYAN
Gopalsamy Jayaraman (died) – Appellant
Versus
Kothandaraman – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. A.L. Somayaji Senior counsel For Mr. V. Srikath.
For the Respondents: Mr. N. Manokaran, Mr. T.R. Rajaraman, Mr. L.K. Manjunath, Mr. T.S. Baskaran, Mr. G. Mutharasu.

ORDER :

[Prayer :- Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to allow the above Civil Revision Petition and set aside the judgment and decree dated 24.07.2009 made in O.S.No.26 of 2006 on the file of the learned II Additional District Judge, Pudhucherry.

Prayer :- Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to allow the above Civil Revision Petition and set aside the judgment and decree dated 24.07.2009 made in I.A.No.19 of 2006 in O.S.No.26 of 2006 on the file of the learned II Additional District Judge, Pudhucherry.]

These Civil Revision Petitions are filed as against fair and decreetal orders dated 24.07.2009, passed by the learned II Additional District Judge, Pudhucherry in O.S.No.26 of 2006 and I.A.No.19 of 2006 in O.S.No.26 of 2006, thereby dismissing the suit by allowing the petition filed under Order 14 Rule 1 & 2 of C.P.C., praying that the issue of valuation of suit and payment of Court fees thereupon may be taken as preliminary issue before deciding the other issues.

2. The petitioners are the plaintiffs and the respondents are the defendants. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their