SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Telangana) 852

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. Surender, J
Sakki Laxmi – Appellant
Versus
Gaini Gangamani – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : P. Sajan Kumar

ORDER :

1. The revision petitioners, who are defendants 1 to 3, 5, and 6 in O.S. No. 281 of 2021, have filed this revision petition challenging the order dated 13.6.2024, passed in I.A. No. 1728 of 2021 in O.S. No. 281 of 2021 by the Principal Junior Civil Judge- cum-Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nizamabad.

2. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the suit in O.S. No. 281 of 2021 has been instituted by the Respondents/Plaintiffs seeking partition and separate possession of joint family properties concerning the suit Schedule Properties detailed in Schedule A and B of the plaint. It has been stated that Begari Pochiga alias Begari Posheety, the father of Respondents/Plaintiffs Nos. 1 and 2, and Petitioners Nos. 4 and 5/Defendants Nos. 5 and 6, as well as the father-in-law of Petitioner No. 1/Defendant No. 1 and the paternal grandfather of Petitioners Nos. 2 and 3/Defendants Nos. 2 to 4, was the owner and possessor of the suit schedule properties described in Schedule A and B. The plaintiffs assert that following the death of Begari Posheety in 1998, Defendants Nos. 1 to 3, 5, and 6 managed to have the suit schedule properties mutated in their names by influencing the revenue a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top