IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
T. RAJA, D. KRISHNAKUMAR, JJ.
Isha Foundation, rep.by its Authorised Signatory C.R. Dinesh Raja - Petitioner
Versus
Union of India, represented by Secretary to Government, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change and Ors. - Respondents
W.P.No.467 of 2022
Decided On : 14-12-2022
Constitution of India,1950 - clause (2) of Article 226 and 142 - Environment Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 6, 19 and 19(a) - Criminal Procedure Code,1973 - Section 200 - Environment Protection Rules, 1986 - Rule 5(3) - Evidence Act - Section 58 - Exemption granted under the EIA Notification - Volunteer-run registered pubilc charitable trust - Petitioner is a volunteer-run registered pubilc charitable trust founded in year 1992 with aims to bring physical, mental and spiritual wellbeing for everyone - It is also a non-profit yoga educational organisation associated with several projects like greenhands, action of rural rejuvenation rally for rivers - Held, Petitioner also comes within definition of educational institution, entitling petitioner to get benefit of exemption from obtaining the environmental clearance for buildings constructed pre as per 8(a) of amended EIA schedule that would necessarily have retrospective operation as agreed by first respondent, impugned notice seeking to initiate prosecution against petitioner cannot be legally sustainable - M.P.Nos.25586 & 28625 of 2022 shall stand rejected - Writ petition stands allowed - Ordered Accordingly
ORDER :
1. The Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Isha Foundation, Coimbatore has filed this writ petition seeking the following prayer, as amended by the order of Court dated 09.11.2022:-
(b) a Writ of Certiorari calling for all the records pertaining to the proceedings of the 4th Respondent in Proc.No.DEE/TNPCS/CBS/F.CBS-NA/R/L/EC/2021 Dated 19.11.2021 and quash the same as illegal.
2. Mr.Sathish Parasaran, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is a volunteer-run registered pubilc charitable trust founded in the year 1992 with aims to bring the physical, mental and spiritual wellbeing for everyone. It is also a non-profit yoga educational organisation associated with several projects like greenhands, action of rural rejuvenation, isha vidya, rally for rivers etc. The petitioner also received the Indira Gandhi Paryavaran Puraskar in the year 2010 for undertaking activities including conducting classes and training on agroforestry to farmers, plant nurseries in schools and tree planting in urban centres. The petitioner also had set up the Isha Yoga Center in the year 1994 to run a group of educational institutions, offering variety of courses such as Yoga, Classical Arts and Sanskrit through a Gurukula format and the educational institution being affiliated to the ICSE Board. The petitioner established the Isha Yoga Centre with buildings organically covering 48.3 hectares of 1,25,849 sq.m. built up area from the year 1994 onwards near Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, out of which an extent of 28,279 sq.m. of land had been used for construction even before the Environment Impact Assessment Notification, 2006 came into force and thereafter, an extent of 91,519 sqm was constructed between the years 2006 and 2012. Adding further, the learned Senior Counsel submitted that the Isha Yoga Centre has been created for the well being of the society and all the buildings at the Isha Yoga Centre are primarily used for educational purposes. It is also the claim of the petitioner that the petitioner has been accredited by the Ministry of Home Affairs to conduct yoga programs under which student visas are issued to students from multiple countries, because the petitioner is working in collaboration with the Ministry of Ayush, Government of India for conducting various yoga programs. Besides, Isha Home School, a residential school under the ICSE Board, it is also running Isha Hatha Yoga School by providing certificate courses for the students from 60+ countries to each hatha yoga across the world.
3. While so, the petitioner made an application for grant of necessary approvals and the Director of Town and Country Planning granted a conditional approval on 03.05.2017 to the building plan on condition that the petitioner shall not commence any activity, excepting fencing of the site and construction of temporary shed for guard, without obtaining environmental clearance under the EIA Notification 2006 from the State Level Environmental Impact Assessment Authority, the fifth respondent herein. Therefore, the petitioner applied for environmental clearance under category 8(a) of the EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006 and the same was submitted to the fifth respondent. Besides, the
Kusum Ingots & Alloys Ltd. v Union of India and others
National Highways Authority of India v. Pandarinathan Govindarajulu and another
Mohinder Singh Gill and another v. Chief Election Commissioner, New Delhi and others
Ex post facto environmental clearance permissible; educational institutions including medical colleges with hospitals exempted from prior clearance; prosecution quashed upon subsequent clearance and ....
Project proponents must obtain Environmental Clearance before commencing construction as failure constitutes a legal violation, necessitating remediation and compensation under environmental laws.
An educational institution must obtain Environmental Clearance, and hospitals are not exempt from this requirement under the EIA Notification, confirming obligations for compliance with environmental....
Environmental regulations mandate prior Environmental Clearance and Consent to Operate for hospitals, and failure to obtain these constitutes a violation that necessitates compensation for ecological....
Court held that amendments to the Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, which shifted authority and reduced public consultation, were unconstitutional and violated environmental protections u....
The notification extending environmental clearance validity without proper consultation is unconstitutional, undermining environmental protection statutes.
The court ruled that amendments extending environmental clearance validity violate statutory and constitutional mandates, undermining effective environmental governance and public interest.
The amendments to environmental clearance validity under EIA Notification are unconstitutional as they violate statutory provisions and undermine environmental protections.
The court ruled that amendments to environmental clearance regulations violated statutory requirements, emphasizing the importance of expert appraisal in environmental protection, thus declaring the ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.