V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
Manickam Kandiar – Appellant
Versus
Rengammal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.
1. The present appeal arises out of the Judgment and Decree in A.S.No. 18 of 1994, on the file of the Sub Court, Pattukkottai dated 31.07.1995 in confirming the judgment and Decree in O.S.No. 438 of 1991 dated 29.07.1994 on the file of the District Munsif Court at Pattukkottai. The appellant before me is the 1st Defendant in the suit. The suit had been presented by one Rengammal and Banumathi (a person who was born with hearing and speech challenges). The relief sought for in the suit was for a declaration that the plaintiffs are the owners of the property and for a consequential order of injunction restraining the defendants 1 & 2 from interfering with their peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property. The core facts are not in dispute.
2. The father of the plaintiff was one Rathinam Sethuruyar. The plaintiffs were born from the wedlock between said Sethuruyar and Silambayi, the 2nd defendant. Ratnam Sethurayar had a younger brother by name Kannuswami Sethurayar. The said Kannusami Sethurayar had gone to Singapore, earned income and purchased the suit schedule property. Both parties agree that Ratnam Sethuruyar died in the year 1967, and Kannu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.