SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 1590

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. VAIDYANATHAN, R. KALAIMATHI, JJ.
Annadurai – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector, Ariyalur & Others – Respondents
W.P. No. 6135 of 2022
Decided On : 02-03-2023

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:R. Angalaparameshwari, Advocate. For the Respondents: P. Muthukumar, State Government Pleader assisted By P. Balathandayutham, Special Government Pleader.

The legal principle established is that 'vandipathai' cannot be encroached upon, and the court can issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the removal of encroachment.

Headnote:

Writ of Mandamus - Encroachment on Road - The court directed the 4th respondent to remove encroachment on the road in Survey Numbers 304/4, 305/5, 313/11 at Suthamalli Village, emphasizing that 'vandipathai' cannot be encroached upon.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking the removal of encroachment on the road in Survey Numbers 304/4, 305/5, 313/11 at Suthamalli Village due to unauthorized cultivation by the encroacher.

Finding of the Court:

The court acknowledged the grievance of the petitioner and noted that the encroachment was hindering the provision of bore well electricity connection to the petitioner's agricultural lands. The court directed the 4th respondent to take necessary steps to remove the encroachers by a specified date.

Issues: Non-removal of encroachment on the road, hindrance to providing electricity connection to the petitioner's agricultural lands.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that 'vandipathai' cannot be encroached upon and directed the 4th respondent to ensure the removal of encroachers by a specified date.

Final Decision: The writ petition was disposed of, and the 4th respondent was directed to take necessary steps to remove the encroachers by a specified date.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer:Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 3rd respondent to remove the encroachment of the road in Survey Number 304/4, 305/5, 313/11 at Suthamalli Village by way of illegal and unauthorized cultivation by the encroacher based on my representation to the 3rd respondent on 27.04.2022.)

S. Vaidyanathan, J.,

1. The present writ petition is filed for issue of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 3rd respondent to remove the encroachment of the road in Survey Numbers 304/4, 305/5, 313/11 at Suthamalli Village by way of illegal and unauthorized cultivation by the encroacher based on my representation to the 3rd respondent on 27.04.2022.

2. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to non-removal of encroachment on the road in Survey Numbers 304/4, 305/5 and 313/11 at Suthamalli Village by the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the place has been identified by the Electricity Board for bore well electricity connection to the petitioner’s agricultural lands and unless the encroachers are evicted/removed, there is no possibility of providing the same to the petitioner.

4. Though the encroachers have not been made as parties, Mr.P. Muthukumar, learned State Government Pleader appearing for the respondents produced a communication of the Tahsildar, Udayarpalayam, dated 08.11.2022 asking the Block Development Officer, T. Pazhur, Udayarpalayam to take necessary steps to remove the encroachments and to send a report. It is represented by the learned State Government Pleader that the encroachers have voluntarily stated that after harvest in the pathway, they are willing to vacate the place. He would further state that action has been initiated and that no further encroachment could be made in the aforesaid survey numbers.

5. Heard both sides.

6. Since the Block Development Officer, T. Pazhur, Udayarpalayam is a necessary party to the writ petition, this Court suo motu impleads the said authority as 4th respondent to the writ petition. Learned State Government Pleader takes notice on behalf of the newly impleaded 4th respondent.

7. A perusal of the copy of the “ A” Register produced before this Court would make it very clear that the three survey numbers namely, 304/4, 305/5, 313/11 at Suthamalli Village mentioned by the petitioner are ‘vandipathai’ and therefore, no one is entitled to encroach upon the same.

8. In view of the submission made by the learned State Government Pleader that action has been initiated to remove the encroachers, the 4th respondent shall take necessary steps and ensure that the encroachers are removed by 15th June, 2023.

9. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top