SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 1693

V. BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
B. Venkatesh – Appellant
Versus
A. Karlina – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:K. Kannan, Advocate. For the Respondent: No appearance.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 22.12.2020 in I.A.No.4 of 2019 in H.M.O.P.No.325 of 2019 passed by the Additional Family court, Chennai.)

The present Civil Revision Petition has been filed to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 22.12.2020 in I.A.No.4 of 2019 in H.M.O.P.No.325 of 2019 passed by the Additional Family court, Chennai.

2. The brief facts of the case are as follows:-

The petitioner and the respondent, who are husband and wife have filed a petition in H.M.O.P.No.325 of 2019 to dissolve the marriage soleminised between them on 13.03.2000 on mutual consent. The said H.M.O.P.was allowed and the said marriage was dissolved by a decree of divorce on the ground of mutual consent. Subsequently, I.A.No.4 of 2019 was filed by the respondent / wife to direct the petitioner / husband to return sreedhana and household articles to her and a counter was filed by the respondent resisting the claim. The court below allowed the said petition. Aggrieved against the same, the petitioner / husband is before this Court.

3. The case of the petitioner / husband is that the arran

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top