Back
S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
K. R. Gnaneswaran – Appellant
Versus
Government of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the Principal Secretary to Government, School Education Department – Respondent
ORDER :
The order dated 13.11.2013 passed by the first respondent is sought to be quashed in the present writ petition.
2. The petitioner in the present writ petition seeks for a direction to the respondents to grant the benefit of G.O.Ms. No.210, Education, dated 14.08.2009 to the petitioner by upgrading the petitioner as Secondary Grade Teacher from 16.10.1967 and grant consequential selection and special grade scale of pay to the petitioner in the post of B.Ed., Middle School Headmaster and grant arrears of pay and pension.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner made a submission that the petitioner was pursuing the matter and he filed writ petition on earlier occasion.
4. Be that as it may, even in case, the petitioner pursued the matter, this Court is of an opinion that the issues raised by the petitioner are no more res integra.
5. This Court has elaborately considered all the Government Orders in this subject and passed an order on 25.01.2022 in W.P.(MD) Nos.3186 and 3187 of 2016.
6. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents made a submission that the facts in the writ petition on hand as well as the facts decided by this Court in W.P.(MD)
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the entitlement to selection/special grade for government employees is based on stagnation in the same post without promotion for a certain pe....
The concept of granting selection grade and special grade should not be tampered with and that teachers are either eligible for promotion or for Selection/Special Grade, not both.
Stale and belated claims cannot be entertained, and benefits as directed by a Full Bench order shall be extended only to parties before the Court, with no fresh writ petitions entertained after a spe....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of teachers promoted as Primary School Headmasters after 01.06.1988 to the financial benefits of Selection Grade and Special Gra....
The main legal point established is the inapplicability of G.O.Ms.No.216 to the petitioner due to delay and laches, and the determination that the petitioner, working in a private aided school, was o....
The court emphasized the importance of considering the appellant's claim purely on merits and in accordance with law, without being influenced by any previous observations.
The court affirmed that benefits under government orders must be uniformly extended to all similarly situated individuals, regardless of their litigation status.
A Physical Education Teacher is not entitled to salary benefits under G.O.Ms.No.216, which applies only to specific teaching categories, and claims for arrears during service are unjustified due to t....
The main legal point established is that the service period in an aided institution should be considered for the grant of Special Grade Pay as per G.O.Ms.No.992, Education Department, dated 22.06.197....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
