IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.S. RAMESH, J.
S. Radhamani and Anr. - Petitioners
Versus
The Government of Tamil Nadu rep. by the Secretary to the Government, School Education Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai-600009 and 2 Ors. - Respondents
W.P.No.33709 of 2018
Decided On : 20-01-2023
Constitution of India, 1949 – Article, 226 – Power of High Court to issue certain writs – Claiming benefits – Government in G.O. School Education Department had awarded Special Grade and Fixation of pay to 65 Middle School Graduate Headmasters by counting their services rendered prior post of Secondary Grade Teachers and Primary School Headmasters – Claiming benefits both petitioners herein have filed present Writ Petition – Held, Learned three Single Judges without reference to two Hon'ble Division Benches which squarely covers issue in hand are res integral help Government – First respondent pass appropriate orders petitioners by extending benefits Education (G1) Department award Selection Special Grade scale of pay in post of B.T. Graduate Middle School Headmaster by counting their lower grade secondary grade Assistant service and Elementary School Head Master Services rendered by them in accordance with consequently revise their pensioner benefits – Writ Petition stands allowed.
ORDER :
[Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Certiorarified Mandamus, directing to quash the letter dated 11.09.2013 bearing Ref. No.24631/D.3/2012-2 by a suitable amendment to the G.O. Ms. No.146 of Education Department dated 19.06.2012 and consequently directing the respondents to extend the benefits of G.O. Ms. No.210, School Education Department dated 14.08.2009 insofar as the petitioners are concerned and accordingly to award Selection/Special Grade scale of pay in the post of B.T. Grade Middle School Headmaster to the petitioners by counting their lower grade Secondary Grade Assistant service, Elementary School Head Master Services as has been granted to similarly placed persons through G.O. Ms. No.210, School Education Department dated 14.08.2009.]
1. The Government in G.O. (Ms) No.210, School Education (G1) Department, dated 14.08.2009 had awarded Special Grade and Fixation of pay to 65 Middle School Graduate Headmasters by counting their services rendered prior to 01.06.1988 in the post of Secondary Grade Teachers and Primary School Headmasters. Claiming the benefits of G.O.(Ms) No.210 dated 14.08.2009, both the petitioners herein have filed the present Writ Petition.
2. The brief facts of the claim made by these two retired Headmasters are as follows:-
b) On the basis of the recommendations of the Fifth Pay Commission, 65 Graduate School Headmasters had filed Original Applications before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal), seeking for grant of Special Grade and Fixation of Pay, by counting their services rendered prior to 01.06.1988 in the post of Secondary Grade Teachers and Middle School Headmasters. By virtue of favourable orders passed by the Tribunal, as well as the orders of this Court, the Government had passed G.O. (Ms) No.210, School Education (G1) Department, dated 14.08.2009, by awarding Special Grade of Pay, as per the recommendations of the Fifth Pay Commission, to the 65 Graduate School Headmasters, who had filed the cases before the Tribunal, by counting their services prior to 01.06.1988 in the post of Secondary Grade Teachers/Primary School Headmasters upto 31.05.1988. Likewise, similar benefits of G.O. (Ms) No.210, dated 14.08.2009 were also extended to 260 Middle School Headmasters, sanctioning the Special Grade of Pay to them by counting their services rendered in the post of Secondary Grade Teachers/Primary School Headmasters/Middle School Headmasters prior to 01.06.1988 through G.O. (Ms) No.146, School Education Department, dated 19.06.2012.
c) When the petitioners herein had approached this Court earlier in W.P.No.9029 of 2011, this Court by its order dated 07.04.2011 had directed the respondents to consider the petitioners' claim within a stipulated time. However, their claims were not considered under G.O. (Ms) No.146, dated 19.06.2012. Thereafter, the petitioners had given representations to the third respondent on 28.01.2013 and 19.04.2013. Pursuant to which, two separate orders dated 11.09.2013 were p
The concept of granting selection grade and special grade should not be tampered with and that teachers are either eligible for promotion or for Selection/Special Grade, not both.
Stale and belated claims cannot be entertained, and benefits as directed by a Full Bench order shall be extended only to parties before the Court, with no fresh writ petitions entertained after a spe....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the entitlement to selection/special grade for government employees is based on stagnation in the same post without promotion for a certain pe....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of teachers promoted as Primary School Headmasters after 01.06.1988 to the financial benefits of Selection Grade and Special Gra....
Entitlement to benefits from government orders cannot be denied based on promotion dates when similar claims have been upheld in precedent cases.
The delay in approaching the court does not affect the claim for pay protection and higher pension, and the recurring cause of action in matters of pay scale and consequential pension justifies the r....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.