IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.S. RAMESH, J.
P. Jebasahila & Others – Appellants
Versus
The Principal Secretary to Government, Health & Family Welfare Department, Chennai & Others – Respondents
W.P. Nos. 2424, 3295, 3484, 3915, 7562, 17771, 17776, 17784, 17789, 17793, 17864, 17871, 17917, 17926, 17937, 17954, 17975, 17972, 17970, 17974, 17949, 17959, 17966, 17973, 17987, 17860, 17880, 17902, 17915, 17922, 18144, 18148, 18151, 18164, 18170, 18410, 18425, 18429, 18464, 18463, 17867, 17935, 17942, 17901, 17911, 18407, 18768, 17737, 17739, 17744, 17747, 17753 & 19057 of 2023 & connected Civil Miscellaneous Petitions
Decided On : 12-07-2023
Legitimate Expectations - Nurses' Recruitment - Disaster Management Act, 2005 - Article 14 of the Constitution of India - 2020 SCC OnLine SC 968 - (2023) 5 SCC 688
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, who were appointed as Nurses on a contract basis, sought permanent absorption based on the promise made in the recruitment notification. The impugned order discontinued their services, leading to the petitioners' claim of legitimate expectations and promissory estoppel.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioners' legitimate expectations for permanent absorption were justified due to the initial promise made in the recruitment notification and the government's decision to permanently absorb some candidates while denying the same to the petitioners, constituting hostile discrimination. The impugned orders were quashed, and the court directed the government to permanently absorb the petitioners as Nurses in government hospitals/healthcare institutions.
Issues: Legitimate expectations, promissory estoppel, discrimination, permanent absorption of contract Nurses
Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the doctrine of legitimate expectations and promissory estoppel, citing relevant legal principles from 2020 SCC OnLine SC 968 and (2023) 5 SCC 688, to justify the petitioners' claim for permanent absorption and to establish hostile discrimination by the government.
Final Decision: The impugned orders were quashed, and the government was directed to permanently absorb the petitioners as Nurses in government hospitals/healthcare institutions.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records in connection with the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent in G.O.(D)No.1412, Health and Family Welfare (AA1) Department, dated 30.12.2022 and quash the same and further direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioners as Nurse and regularise them within a reasonable time with all attendant benefits.)
Common Order:
1. The brief facts of the cases are as follows:
1.1. The Medical Services Recruitment Board (MSRB) is the recruiting agency dealing with direct recruitment for various posts of Medical and Para Medical categories furnished by the indenting authority, namely the Heads of the Departments in Health and Family Welfare Department. Through a recruitment Notification No.02/MRB/2019, dated 07.02.2019, MSRB had invited online applications for filling up 2345 vacancies of Nurses on contract and consolidated pay basis. Clause 4 of the Notification offered for absorption of the recruitees into regular time scale of pay, after completion of a minimum of 2 years, subject to availability of regular vacancies. All the petitioners herein, who held the required eligibility criteria, participated in the selection process, which consists of written examination and certificate verification. After having been declared successful in the recruitment process, the Director of Medical and Rural Health Services had appointed them as Nurses in the hospitals / Rural Health Services, in the year 2020. Though the terms of the appointment was under a contract for a period of six months, their services were extended thrice through G.O.Ms.No.94, dated 25.02.2021, G.O.D.No.696, dated 04.06.2021 and Government Letter No.11358, dated 29.03.2022.
1.2. In the meantime, COVID 19, pandemic was declared as a notified disaster and the Government had permitted the Director of Medical and Rural Health Services to appoint Nurses on temporary basis to meet the pandemic surge of cases and it is in this background, the services of the petitioners along with the other Nurses were engaged. From among the successful candidates in 2019 recruitment process, 1000 and 1323 candidates were offered for appointment through a Special Notification Nos.2/2020 and 3/2020, both dated 30.03.2020. Likewise, through another Notification No.5/2020, dated 02.05.2020, 2570 candidates were offered for appointment out of which 977 Nurses were permanently absorbed. Through a subsequent Special Notification dated 08.06.2020, an additional list of 1166 Nurses, who were successful in 2019 recruitment process were also appointed. All these Nurses, who were permanently absorbed, were the successful candidates in 2019 recruitment process, like that of the petitioners herein.
1.3. While all these petitioners were continuing in contract basis and were awaiting for permanency, the present impugned order in G.O.(D.)No.1412, Health and Family Welfare (AA1) Department, dated 30.12.2022, came to be passed, wherein it was decided not to extend the services of all the temporary Nurses working in the institution under the Directorate of Medical Education and Directorate of Medical and Rural Health Services, beyond 31.12.2022, which includes the petitioners herein.
2. Mr.K.S.Viswanathan, learned Senior Advocate who appears for some other petitioners herein and whose arguments were adopted by the other petitioners as well, submitted that when the original recruitment notification for appointment on contract and consolidated pay basis had promised that these petitioners would be absorbed into regular time scale of pay after completion of a minimum of 2 years, their contract services were also regularly extended on three occasions, these petitioners had accepted the appointment orders under a legitimate expectation that they would be permanently absorbed. Thus, the present impugned order, discont
The doctrine of legitimate expectations and promissory estoppel justifies claims for permanent absorption and establishes hostile discrimination by the government.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the government's action of cancelling the antedating regularization was arbitrary, discriminatory, and violated the principles of natural just....
Regularization of services must be from the date of initial appointment for similarly situated employees to avoid discrimination under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.
The court ruled that contract employees with over ten years of service against sanctioned posts are entitled to regularization, emphasizing the need for fair recruitment processes and age relaxation ....
The judgment establishes that long-term contractual employees may be entitled to regularization if their appointments were made through a proper selection process, ensuring compliance with constituti....
Regularization of service remains contingent upon the existence of a regular vacancy and recruitment process; where the government has exercised a valid policy option for temporary recruitment over p....
Contractual employees have no vested right to continuation of service beyond the agreed term, and the court cannot compel an employer to extend such contracts.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.