Back
N. MALA
Sri Paduka Distributors, Rep. by its partner R. Rajagopal, Chennai – Appellant
Versus
Employees` State Insurance Corporation, Represented by the Regional Director, Chennai – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 82 of the Employees'' State Insurance Act, praying to set aside the order and decree of the Employees Insurance Court (Principal Labour Court) Chennai dated 17.08.2021 in EIOP No.57 of 2002.)
1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed to set aside the order and decree of the Employees Insurance Court (Principal Labour Court), Chennai dated 17.08.2021 in EIOP No.57 of 2002.
2. The above appeal was admitted on the following questions of law.
"1. Has not the ESI Court erred in overlooking the plea of jurisdiction raised by the Petitioner, in respect of the employees whose Headquarters are at different regions.
2. Whether the ESI Court was justified in concluding that the demand of the Regional Office, ESI Corporation for employees engaged outside the State of Tamil Nadu was proper.
3. Whether ESI Court was justified in overlooking the evidence of RW-1, who has candidly admitted that the demand, in so far as employees employed outside the state of Tamil Nadu are concerned, cannot be made."
3. The appellant being a Distributor, was engaged in distribution and sale of consumers p
The central legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of the appellant to the benefit of G.O.Ms.No.2082, Labour Department dated 29.08.1983, exempting employees on tour for 7 months ....
An appeal against recovery proceedings under the E.S.I. Act is not maintainable without first challenging the correctness of the preceding order under Section 45-A.
Cooperation with authorities and production of genuine documents are essential in disputing establishment coverage under the E.S.I. Act.
The court established that employment status must be supported by concrete evidence, and inferences drawn without such evidence are insufficient to impose liability under the Employees’ State Insuran....
The functional integrality of the establishments justified their clubbing and coverage under the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for approaching the ESI Court for adjudication of disputes under the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948.
The Act's implementation cannot be postponed due to the non-availability of a full-fledged hospital, and the rejection of representation seeking a full-fledged hospital did not violate the principles....
The voluntary contribution under the EPF Act does not automatically encompass an establishment under the ESI Act, and the Act cannot be extended to establishments without a notification from the appr....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
