G. JAYACHANDRAN
State Represented by, Inspector of Police, Chennai – Appellant
Versus
M. Abdul Hakeem. Chennai – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Criminal Appeal has been filed under Section 378 of Cr.P.C., pleasedto set aside the judgment dated 05.12.2012 in Criminal Appeal No.240 of 2010in C.C.No.15491 of 2008 passed by the Learned III Additional Sessions Judge,Chennai, acquitting the respondent/accused (A2 and A3) for the chargeslevelled against them and convict them for the offences charged in the interestof justice.)
1. This Criminal Appeal is preferred by the State being aggrieved bythe order of the Lower Appellate Court acquitting the accused by reversing thejudgment of the trial Court convicting the respondent for the offences underSection 20 r/w 4 of Indian Telegraph Act and Section 21 of Indian TelegraphAct, 1885.
2. The case of the prosecution is that, between June 2004 andMarch 2005, A1 Abdul Hakeem established illegal telecom hub in the name ofM/s.Casino Courier Service, at Door No.75, II Floor Triplicane High Road,Triplicane, Chennai. He was a running parallel Telecom Exchange withoutobtaining valid license. In pursuant to the criminal conspiracy,Mr.T.S.Saravanan, Proprietor of M/s.Vaibhav En
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.