SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 2113

G. JAYACHANDRAN
State Represented by, Inspector of Police, Chennai – Appellant
Versus
M. Abdul Hakeem. Chennai – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:K. Srinivasan, Senior Counsel Special Public Prosecutor (CBI). For the Respondent: Naveen Kumar Murthi, Legal Aid Counsel

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Criminal Appeal has been filed under Section 378 of Cr.P.C., pleasedto set aside the judgment dated 05.12.2012 in Criminal Appeal No.240 of 2010in C.C.No.15491 of 2008 passed by the Learned III Additional Sessions Judge,Chennai, acquitting the respondent/accused (A2 and A3) for the chargeslevelled against them and convict them for the offences charged in the interestof justice.)

1. This Criminal Appeal is preferred by the State being aggrieved bythe order of the Lower Appellate Court acquitting the accused by reversing thejudgment of the trial Court convicting the respondent for the offences underSection 20 r/w 4 of Indian Telegraph Act and Section 21 of Indian TelegraphAct, 1885.

2. The case of the prosecution is that, between June 2004 andMarch 2005, A1 Abdul Hakeem established illegal telecom hub in the name ofM/s.Casino Courier Service, at Door No.75, II Floor Triplicane High Road,Triplicane, Chennai. He was a running parallel Telecom Exchange withoutobtaining valid license. In pursuant to the criminal conspiracy,Mr.T.S.Saravanan, Proprietor of M/s.Vaibhav En

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top