CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
Santosh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
1. The instant Criminal Writ Petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Article 226 read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction in the nature for quashing of the order no. 14/3/97-CBI dated 30th January, 2018, issued by Ministry of Home Affairs (hereinafter “MHA”) which permitted interception of telephonic calls of the petitioner, in the exercise of the powers conferred under Section 5(2) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 and Rule 419 (A) of the Indian Telegraph Rules 2007. The Petitioner further seeks that the interception messages/calls obtained/recorded thereunder shall be destroyed and not to be used for any purposes.
FACTUAL MATRIX
2. Brief facts of the case are as laid down under:
Justice K.S. Puttaswamy vs. Union of India
K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India
Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India
Pooran Mal v. Director of Inspection (1974) 1 SCC 345
People’s Union of Civil Liberties (PUCL) vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors.
Sanjay Singh Ramrao Chavan v. Dattatray Gulabrao Phalke (2015) 3 SCC 123.
State of Punjab vs. Davinder Pal Singh Bhullar
Yashwant Sinha vs. CBI Through Director
A.K. Gopalan vs. State of Madras
Additional District Magistrate (Rev.) Delhi Admn. &Ors. v Sri Ram &Ors
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.