Back
C. V. KARTHIKEYAN
V. Srinivasan – Appellant
Versus
Controller Tamil Nadu Agriculture University, Coimbatore – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the order passed by the third respondent in No.ALO/WP No. 38586/2015 dated 15.02.2016 and quash the same and further direct the respondents to follow the G.O.408 dated 25.08.2009 and pay pension with accrued interest.)
1. Writ Petition has been filed in the nature of Certiorarified Mandamus seeking interference with an order passed by the third respondent / the Registrar, Tamil Nadu Agriculture University, Coimbatore District, in No. ALO/WP No. 38586/2015 dated 15.02.2016 and direct the respondents to follow G.O 408 dated 25.08.2009 and pay pension with accrued interest.
2. The Writ Petition had been filed by V.Srinivasan, who had been appointed as Casual Mazdoor in the second respondent / the Directorate of Research, Tamil Nadu Rice Research Institute, Aduthurai, Tanjore District, on 05.06.1975. He worked till 18.09.1989. He was then made permanent as a provisionalised unskilled mazdoor and later, as Office Assistant. He retired on attaining the age of superannuation on 28.02.2015 as Office Assistant (Selection Grade). The pe
The court established that 50% of daily wage service should be considered for pension calculation, as per previous judgments.
The court established the applicability of G.O.Ms.No.408, Finance (Pension) Department dated 25.08.2009 to employees working on daily wages and directed the inclusion of 50% of the services for calcu....
Under Rule 13 thereof, the service that qualifies for pension commences from the date the employee takes charge of the post to which he is appointed either substantively or in an officiating/temporar....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the entire length of service from the date of initial appointment should be considered for the purposes of fixation of pensionary benefits.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of relevant case law, specifically the judgments in the cases of Sunder Singh, Balo Devi, and Roop Lal, to determine pension ent....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need to follow Rule 11(2) of the Pension Rules and the Full Bench Judgement in determining the eligibility for pensionary benefits.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the benefits of pension to daily wagers should be calculated from the date of their initial appointments, as per the Government Resolution dat....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
