SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 2260

R. KALAIMATHI
C. Sarasu – Appellant
Versus
S. Muthusamy – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:R. Nalliyappan For the Respondent:R1, No appearance. R2, M. Jayaraj, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Judgment and Decree dated 24.03.2021 made in M.C.O.P.No.371 of 2019 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Sub Court, Rasipuram.)

1. Not being satisfied by the award passed by the learned Tribunal in M.C.O.P.No.371 of 2019 on 24.03.2021 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Sub Court, Rasipuram, the legal heirs namely, the wife, two married daughters Smt. Punitha Raja and Kalaiselvi Mani and two sons of the deceased V.Chandrasekaran have preferred this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal for enhancement of compensation.

2.The claim petition was filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, R/W Rule 3 of TNMACT Rules, claiming compensation of Rs.30,00,000/- for the death of the deceased, who died in the road accident that occurred on 30.09.2019.

3.The learned Tribunal, after hearing both sides arguments and upon consideration of oral and documentary evidence has passed an award for a sum of Rs.7,58,400/- with interest at the rate of 7.5% pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top