SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 2324

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
Manisha – Appellant
Versus
Manickkam – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:Amar D.Pandiya, Advocate. For the Respondent:R1 to R4, No Appearance R5, R. Sree Vidhya, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 09.01.2019 made in M.C.O.P.No.1965 of 2016 on the file of the Special District Court, (II, Additional District Judge), FAC, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Salem.)

1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 09.01.2019 made in M.C.O.P.No.1965 of 2016 on the file of the Special District Court, (II, Additional District Judge), FAC, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Salem.

2. The respondents 1 to 3/claimants are the father, step mother and step sister of the deceased, who filed M.C.O.P.No.1965 of 2016, showing the appellants herein/wife and daughter of the deceased as respondents 3 & 4, on the file of the Special District Court, (II, Additional District Judge), FAC, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Salem, claiming a sum of Rs.25,00,000/- as compensation for the death of one Jayakumar, who died in the accident that took place on 16.05.2016.

3. The Tribunal considering the pleadings, oral and documentary e

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top