SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 2486

S. S. SUNDAR, D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
G. Sadaiyandi – Appellant
Versus
District Judge, Dindigul – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:B. Prasanna Vinoth, Advocate. For the Respondent:K. Samidurai, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to the call the records relating to the impugned order vide Roc.No.2254/2012/A1/PDJ-DGL, dated 28.06.2012 passed by the respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to refix the petitioner''s basic pay and grade pay as per Rule 27(2) of Fundamental Rules on par with the pay of his junior V.Ramachandran as on 01.04.2012.)

D. Bharatha Chakravarthy, J.

This writ petition is filed by the petitioner for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order dated 28.06.2012 passed by the respondent and consequently direct the respondent to refix the petitioner''s basic pay and grade pay as per the Rule 27(2) of the Fundamental Rules on par with the pay of his junior V.Ramachandran as on 01.04.2012.

2. The factual matrix on which the case arises is admitted by both sides. The petitioner originally joined service as Examiner on 15.02.1982 and thereafter, was promoted as Junior Assistant on 01.10.1984 and Assistant on 01.04.1992. In the said cadre, he was posted as Sheristadar Category-II

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top