B. gane Naik vs Union Of India - 2024 Supreme(AP) 654

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(AP) 654

K. MANMADHA RAO
B. gane Naik – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: S.M. Subhan
For the Respondents: G. Arun Showri (Central Govt. Counsel), V. Venkata Naga Raju.

ORDER :

(K. Manmadha Rao, J.) :

WP No.23997 of 2020 is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the following relief:

“… to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of MANDAMUS by holding that the action of the respondents in not considering the case of the petitioners for re fixation of the Pay by rectifying the pay anomaly as capricious violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India contrary to F R 22 (1a) I R/w Rule 13 of CCS RP Rules 2016 and as such liable to be set aside in the interest of justice with a consequential direction to the respondents to directing to consider the case of all the petitioners for refixation of the Pay by rectifying the pay anomaly with all the consequential benefits and to pay the arrears of difference of salary from the date of pay anomalous introduced forthwith and pass…”

WP No.23938 of 2020 is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the following relief:

“….to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of MANDAMUS by holding that the action of the respondents in not considering the case of the petitioners for re fixation of the Pay by rectifying the pay anomal