SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 2494

ABDUL QUDDHOSE
Official Assignee, High Court, Madras – Appellant
Versus
Vasavi Communications, Rep. by its Sole Proprietrix, K. Narmadha – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:K. Harishankar, Advocate. For the Respondents:R3 & R4, C.P.G. Yoganand, Advocate, R1 & R2, Set Ex-parte.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Application has been filed under Section 55 of the Presidency Town Insolvency Act, 1908 read with Order II Rule 1 of Insolvency Rules to set aside the sale in favour of the respondent Nos.3 and 4 under the sale deed dated 18.08.2011 registered as Document No.1752 of 2011, SRO Thyagaraya Nagar and declare the said sale null and void.)

The issue that arises for consideration in this application filed by the Official Assignee under Section 55 of the Presidency Town Insolvency Act, 1909 (Hereinafter referred to as “1909 Act“) is whether the sale deed dated 18.08.2011 executed by the respondent Nos.1 and 2 (Insolvents) in favour of the respondent Nos.3 and 4 (purchasers) has been executed in “good faith“ and “for valuable sale consideration“.

2. The debtor petition in I.P.No.14 of 2012 was filed by the respondent Nos.1 and 2 on 14.02.2012 to declare themselves as insolvents. They were adjudicated as insolvents by this Court on their petition vide order dated 16.02.2012 and thereafter, they had filed their statements on 12.06.2012.

3. According to the Official Assignee,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top