BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
G.R. SWAMINATHAN, M. DHANDAPANI, K. MURALI SHANKAR, JJ.
S. Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector Kokkirakulam Tirunelveli & Others – Respondents
W.P. (MD) No. 14341 of 2022 & W.M.P. (MD) Nos. 10246, 10247, 10249, 10251, 21098 of 2022
Decided On : 13-06-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition for mandamus regarding business operations. (Para 1) |
| 2. environmental damage due to illegal mining prompts legal framework. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. writ petition seeks return of seized vehicles following regulations. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 10) |
| 4. clarification petition sought due to empowerment conflicts. (Para 7) |
| 5. discrepancy about authorized officer for vehicle seizure. (Para 12) |
| 6. police's authorisation and role in certifying compliance with legal provisions. (Para 19 , 20 , 22) |
| 7. court emphasizes role of police in environmental law enforcement. (Para 60) |
| 8. joint consideration of offences under both ipc and mmdr act is necessary. (Para 72 , 86) |
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying this Court for issuance of mandamus, to direct the respondents, more particularly the first respondent permitting the petitioner to continue his business of crusher operation in the property bearing Survey Nos.844, 848 and 849/2 in the name of Venkateswara Crusher at Door No.815 Adamithipankuam, Tharuvai Village, Palayamkottai Taluk, Tirunelveli District and further direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to permit the petitioner to take back his vehicles as parked in his Patta land at Thuruvai Village, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli District and also direct the5th respondent to permit the petitioner to operate Bank, Overdue Account bearing Account No. 152700050900047 with Tamil Nadu Mercantile Bank, Palayamkottai Branch near St. John College, Tirunelveli District and further direct the respondents to break open the seal of the petitioner''s chamber and crusher office situated at Palayamkottai in the main road leading to Nagercoil from Tirunelveli and also further permit to take back all the vehicles such as Tractor, Tipper Lorry, Torus Lorry, Kittachi, JCB, Pockline, Bench Lorry, Motorcycle, Pickup Vehicle, TATA Pickup, Mahindra Pickup, Kobelco 380 (for removing mud) and two wheelers forthwith.)
M. Dhandapani, J.
The damage caused to the environment by rampant mining, without following the legal safeguards has led to the enactment of various laws by the Central and State Governments have built in checks and balances to do away with illicit mining. Inspite of the same, many a time, the provisions in the enactments are put to test before the Courts, viz., the High Courts and the Supreme Court as also the Green Tribunal and the judicial arm had extended to safeguard the environment. Inspite of the diligent efforts taken by all the pillars of the democracy, putting a stop to the onslaught of illicit mining is getting to be an arduous task, thereby, many agencies of the State Government are pressed into service to stop illicit mining with the Government conferring power on the said agencies with regard to seizure, launching prosecution and compounding of offences. In the aftermath of the above, the present Full Bench has been constituted upon the orders of the Hon’ble Acting Chief Justice, which was upon a reference made by a Division Bench of this Court, raising certain queries with regard to the provisions of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and the Rules framed thereunder and also the various Government Orders, which have been issued on the basis of the aforesaid Act and the Rules.
2. Before detailing the reasons which prevailed upon the Division Bench to refer the matter to the Full Bench, the points of reference, as have been formulated and placed before this Court for an authoritative answer, are as under :-
“(a) Whether a police personnel can be brought within the ambit of "authorised officer empowered" under Sections 21 (4), 22 and 23-A of the Act?
(b) If the police officer cannot be brought within the fold of an authorised officer and hence he does not have the power to seize the vehicles/materials, what will be the effect of such seizure that had taken place after G.O.Ms. No. 170, dated 05.08.2020 was issued?
(c) Whether the police officer
Police personnel can act as authorised officers to seize vehicles and file complaints under the MMDR Act; they can also compound offences, subject to environmental law compliance.
Point of law: Necessary ingredients for invocation of the powers under Section 457 of the Code having thus not been fulfilled, the provisions of the section cannot be said to be attracted.
Rule 21(4A) clearly provides that any mineral, tool, equipment, vehicle or any other thing seized under sub-section (4) shall be liable to be confiscated by an order of court competent to take cognis....
A court is prohibited from taking cognizance of offences under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, based solely on a police report; such cognizance requires a mandatory com....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.