IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.S. RAMESH, J.
K. Vijayalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
The Secretary to Government, Education Department, St. George Fort, Secretariat, Chennai & Others – Respondents
W.P. No. 12674 of 2022
Decided On : 21-06-2023
Mandamus - Counting Past Service - Duty of Statutory Authority to Consider Representation
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought to count past service as B.T. Assistant in a school and filed a Writ Petition when the representation was not considered.
Finding of the Court:
The Court emphasized the duty of the respondents to consider representations and invoked its powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to direct the consideration of the petitioner's representation within a stipulated time.
Issues: Non-consideration of representation by the Statutory Authority and the duty of the Court to invoke its extraordinary powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court highlighted the duty of the Statutory Authority to consider representations and the power of the Court to invoke Article 226 to direct consideration within a stipulated time.
Final Decision: The Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation within four weeks and disposed of the Writ Petition with no order as to costs.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2, to count the past service of the petitioner as B.T. Assistant in the fifth respondent school from 01.06.1995 to 07.12.1997, in the light of G.O.Ms No.217, School Education Department dated 13.05.1997 and consequential proceedings of the second respondent and third respondent vide Na.Ka.No.52003/G3/95, dated 16.05.1997 and vide Na.Ka.No.11569/P4/97, dated 17.07.1997, respectively, with all consequential benefits for the purpose of pension, by reconsidering the order of the third respondent vide O.Mu.No.6515/A1/2007 dated 12.11.2008, based on the representation of the petitioner dated Nil.01.2022.)
1. By consent of both the parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal.
2. The petitioner herein had given a representation to the respondents on Nil.01.2022, seeking for counting his past service as B.T. Assistant in the fifth respondent school from 01.06.1995 to 07.12.1997, in the light of G.O.Ms No.217, School Education Department dated 13.05.1997 and consequential proceedings of the second respondent and third respondent vide Na.Ka.No.52003/G3/95, dated 16.05.1997 and vide Na.Ka.No.11569/P4/97, dated 17.07.1997, respectively, with all consequential benefits for the purpose of pension, by reconsidering the order of the third respondent vide O.Mu.No.6515/A1/2007 dated 12.11.2008. Since the said representation was not considered, the present Writ Petition has been filed.
3. It is needless to point out that whenever a representation of this nature is made to a Statutory Authority, there is a duty cast upon the respondents to consider the same on its own merits and pass appropriate orders in one way or other, instead of keeping the same pending indefinitely. As such, non-consideration of the representation by the Statutory Authority would amount to dereliction of duty and hence, this Court will be justified in invoking its extraordinary powers under Article 226 of Constitution of India and direct them to consider the same within a stipulated time.
4. In the light of the above observations, there shall be a direction to the respondents herein to consider the petitioner''s representation dated Nil.01.2022 on its own merits and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any of its views with regard to the merits of the claim of the petitioner and that it is open to the concerned respondent to consider the same on its own merits.
5. With the above direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
The duty of the Statutory Authority to consider representations on their own merits and pass appropriate orders, and the court's power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to direct the res....
The petitioner's service from the date of appointment in the unsanctioned post could be taken into account for calculating her pensionable service, as ratified by the Government.
A similarly placed employee is entitled to the same relief granted to others in verified past cases, even if the State claims related matters are sub judice, provided the legal position has been prev....
Prior Division Bench rejection of service regularization bars re-litigation through pension scheme claims under res judicata.
The duty of respondents to consider representations on their merits and the court's power to intervene under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in case of dereliction of duty.
Past services rendered by the Teachers shall be counted for pension, as established by previous judgments.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.