SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 2801

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
G. ILANGOVAN, J.
Arumugam – Appellant
Versus
The Inspector of Police, Tirunelveli – Respondent
Crl OP (MD). No. 16292 of 2023
Decided On : 08-09-2023

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:M/S. K. Suyambulinga Bharathi, Advocates. For The Respondent: B. Nambiselvan, Additional Public Prosecutor.

The court may grant bail based on the consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the period of incarceration.

Headnote:

Bail - Alleged Assault and Threat - The court granted bail to the petitioner/accused based on the consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the period of incarceration.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner was arrested for alleged offences under Sections 294(b), 353, 307, and 506(ii) of IPC. The prosecution claimed that the petitioner, along with other accused persons, abused and threatened the police during a vehicle check.

Finding of the Court:

The court, considering the petitioner's innocence plea and the period of incarceration, granted bail to the petitioner.

Issues: The main issue was the petitioner's involvement in the alleged offences and the request for bail.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the petitioner's innocence plea, the period of incarceration, and the overall facts and circumstances of the case.

Final Decision: The Criminal Original Petition was allowed, and the petitioner was ordered to be released on bail with specific conditions.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: For Bail in Crime No.223 of 2023 on the file of the Respondent Police.)

1. The petitioner / Accused No.1 herein, who was arrested on 21.08.2023 for the alleged offence under Sections 294(b), 353, 307 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.223 of 2023, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 20.08.2023, when the respondent police were on patrol duty at Manappadaiveedu, the petitioner herein / first accused, along with other accused persons, was riding a two wheeler. The respondent stopped and checked the vehicle. At that time, the accused persons abused the respondent in filthy language, tried to assault them with knife and threatened them with dire consequences. Hence the complaint came to be registered against the accused persons.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent, he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. She has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, she seeks for the relief of bail.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioner has involved in another case in Crime No.291 of 2014 and the same is pending.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case and also considering the period of incarceration, this Court is inclined to grant relief to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, on executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.3, Tirunelveli, and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top