Back
SUNDER MOHAN
Embrose – Appellant
Versus
State by Inspector of Police Thiruvottiyur Police Station, Chennai – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, to set aside the Judgment of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur, Tiruvallur District in S.C.No.219 of 2013 dated 30.11.2015 and acquit the appellant herein from the charge under Section 323 of IPC.)
1. This Criminal Appeal has been filed by the accused, challenging the conviction and sentence imposed upon him vide judgment dated 30.11.2015, in S.C.No.219 of 2013, on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur.
2 (i) It is the case of the prosecution that, due to prior enmity and a dispute that arose with regard to the laying of electrical cable, the appellant/accused quarrelled with the deceased and his father and gave a fist blow on the chest of the appellant, as a result of which, the deceased swooned; and that P.W.1/wife of the deceased, took him to the hospital, where he was declared dead.
(ii) It is in the further case of prosecution that P.W.1/wife of the deceased, gave a complaint, and on receipt of the complaint, P.W.9/Inspector of Police, registered the FIR. P.W.9 took up the investigation, visited the scene of the occurren
The prosecution must prove the case beyond reasonable doubt to establish the guilt of the accused.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for the prosecution to establish the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt, including the presence of a clear motive and cre....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the appellant's act did not constitute culpable homicide but fell under Section 323 IPC, leading to the modification of the conviction and sen....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the absence of intention to cause death and the differentiation of charges based on the nature of the assaults and the absence of enmity with th....
The court established that culpable homicide can be distinguished from murder based on the presence of intention and premeditation, particularly in cases of sudden provocation.
The presumption of innocence and the burden of proof require that the prosecution must establish intent and sufficient evidence for a murder conviction.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
