Back
S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
Rajshree Sugars & Chemicals Ltd, Coimbatore – Appellant
Versus
Union of India, Represented by the Chief Director, Directorate of Sugar, New Delhi – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: WP 25901 of 2018 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the first respondent from imposing any restrictions or quotas by way of monthly release orders on the petitioner in the manufacture of sale and supply of white and refined sugar to the extent of enabling the petitioner to pay the dues of the farmers, who have supplied the sugarcane to the petitioner- Company and to maintain the business viability of the petitioner-Company.
WP 32664 of 2018 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondent from imposing any restrictions or quotas by way of monthly release orders on the petitioner in the manufacture of sale and supply of white and refined sugar to the extent of enabling the petitioner to pay the dues of the farmers, who have supplied the sugarcane to the petitioner- Company and to maintain the business viability of the petitioner-Company.
WP 705 of 2019 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondent from imposing any restrictions
The Central Government has the power to impose restrictions on the sugar industry under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and the Sugar (Control) Order 2018, and such restrictions must be reasonabl....
The court ruled that executive instructions cannot override statutory rights and that monopolizing trade through G.O. No. 2976 was unlawful and unconstitutional.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the State lacked the statutory basis to levy an Advisory Price over and above the minimum price fixed by the Central Act, and the enactment of....
The fixation of sugarcane prices must consider the current year's production costs and not rely on previous seasons' recoveries, ensuring proper stakeholder consultation.
The court ruled that administrative actions infringing rights must follow principles of natural justice, requiring a hearing before imposing restrictions under the Sugarcane (Control) Order.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
