Back
R. KALAIMATHI
Managing Director, Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation Ltd. , Bengaluru – Appellant
Versus
Jayapal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, against the judgment and decree dated 11.11.2019 passed passed in M.C.O.P.No.105 of 2018 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Uthangarai.)
1. Not being satisfied by the award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal / Uthangarai Sub-Court, dated 11.11.2019, the appellant herein / respondent Karnataka Road Transport Corporation, has preferred this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal as regards quantum.
2. The claim petition was filed under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, claiming compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- for the injuries sustained by the claimant in a road accident that occurred on 02.05.2018.
3. The Tribunal after hearing both sides and upon consideration of oral and documentary evidence has passed an award for a sum of Rs.2,75,000/- with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of petition till the date of realisation.
4. The learned counsel Mr.T.Thiyagarajan appearing for the appellant, would strenuously contend that the claimant who is s
The central legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to rework the compensation awarded by the Tribunal based on the assessment of evidence and the provisions of the Motor Veh....
The main legal point established is the determination of compensation for injuries under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and the application of the multiplier 15' based on the petitioner's loss of inco....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the assessment of compensation for injuries under the Motor Vehicles Act, considering factors such as loss of earning capacity, pain and sufferi....
The assessment of disability and determination of compensation should consider the multiplier method and relevant Supreme Court judgments.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the assessment of negligence, disability, and loss of income in determining compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act.
The court has the authority to modify the compensation awarded by the Tribunal based on the evidence and nature of the injury suffered by the appellant.
The court emphasized that compensation for injuries must comprehensively address all aspects, including loss of income during treatment, ensuring just and reasonable awards.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
