SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 2031

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.Rajasekar, J.
Baskar - Appellant
Versus
B.Jaganathan – Respondent
C.M.A.No.2612 of 2022
Decided On : 29-11-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.M.Lokesh
For the Respondent: Mr.P.Suresh Srinivasan

The court emphasized that compensation for injuries must comprehensively address all aspects, including loss of income during treatment, ensuring just and reasonable awards.

Headnote:(A) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 173 - Civil Miscellaneous Appeal for enhancement of compensation - Claimant sustained injuries in a road accident due to negligent driving - Tribunal awarded Rs.3,07,057/- which was contested for enhancement - Court enhanced disability compensation from Rs.1,20,000/- to Rs.1,68,000/- and awarded Rs.81,000/- for loss of income during the period of disablement - Total compensation enhanced to Rs.4,36,057/- with interest at 7.5%. (Paras 4, 11, 12)

(B) Compensation - Assessment of compensation must consider all heads including loss of income during treatment - Tribunal's award must be reasonable and justifiable based on evidence presented. (Paras 5, 10)

JUDGMENT :

K.Rajasekar, J.

PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, against the order dated 21.06.2022 made in M.C.O.P.No.7683 of 2018, on the file of MACT/IV-Small Causes Court at Chennai.

The claimant has come forward with this appeal seeking for enhancement of compensation awarded by Tribunal in M.C.O.P.No.7683 of 2018 dated 21.06.2022.

2. According to the claimant, he sustained various injuries in the road accident taken place on 26.10.2018 at about 7.40 p.m., at Thuraipakkam, opposite to Selva Vinayagar Koil, due to the negligent driving of the driver of the 1st respondent. For the injuries sustained, he had filed claim petition for compensation of Rs.14,30,000/- against the respondents 1 and 2 who are the owner and insurer of the offending vehicle.

3. The 1st respondent filed his counter disputing the manner in which the accident had taken place and also disputed the injuries alleged against his driver. The 2nd respondent/Insurance Company contested the claim disputing the manner in which the accident had taken place and also disputed the disability, injuries suffered by the petitioner and also disputed the compensation claimed by the petitioner.

4. Based on the evidence, the Tribunal accepted the claim of the claimant and held that the respondents 1 and 2 are liable to pay compensation for the negligent act of the 1st respondent's driver. The Tribunal has also quantified the compensation and awarded for Rs.3,07,057/- along with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of petition till date of realisation. Aggrieved over the quantum of compensation, the claimant has filed this appeal seeking enhancement of compensation.

5. The learned counsel for the claimant submitted that the Medical Board assessed the disability of the claimant and fixed 24% as permanent disability. The Tribunal, by adopting the percentage method granted Rs.5,000/- per percentage and awarded Rs.1,20,000/- under the head of disability and the same is not in accordance with law. Further, he submitted that the compensation awarded under the head of Medical Expenses is also to be reconsidered since the Tribunal has not properly given explanation for not accepting the medical bills produced by the claimant. He further submitted that the Tribunal has not awarded compensation for the loss of income during the period of disablement.

6. Per contra, the learned counsel appearing for the Insurance Company submitted that based on the evidence, the Tribunal has rightly fixed the just compensation and there is no ground to enhance the compensation.

7. I have considered the submissions of both sides and perused the materials.

8. The Tribunal under the head of disability has awarded Rs.1,20,000/-. There is no dispute regarding disability fixed on the claim. The Medical Board assessed his disability on 24% and it is not functional partial disability. The Tribunal has rightly treated the injuries as partial permanent disability. However, its award of Rs.5,000/- per percentage has to be enhanced, considering the date of accident, this Court is inclined to enhance Rs.7,000/- per percentage. Accordingly, the compensation under the head of disability has been fixed as 24% X Rs.7000/- = Rs.1,68,000/-.

9. The Tribunal has also come forward to award the compensation under the head attender charges, since claimant has undergone treatment for 54 days as inpatient. But, the compensation was not awarded under the head of loss of income during the period of disability. Considering the fact that the claimant was an inpatient taken treatment for 54 days and thereafter also he took treatment in hospital for removal of implant and surgery was also underwent on 27.10.2018, 10.11.2018, 30.01.2019 and 14.05.2019, I am inclined to grant compensation towards loss of income for six months during the period of disablement. Considering the date of accident, notional income is fixed as Rs.13,500/- X 6 months = Rs.81,000/-is awarded. The Tribuna

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top