IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Jagmohan Bansal, J.
Sandeep Singh and another - Petitioners
Versus
Union of India and others - Respondents
CWP-9380-2019
Decided On : 01-02-2024
PAY SCALE - Draughtsman Grade-II (Civil) - 6th Pay Commission, Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India - Para 7.39.22, Para 7.39.23 - The court discussed the recommendations of the 6th Pay Commission, specifically Para 7.39.22 and Para 7.39.23, which recommended the pay scale upgrade for posts carrying minimum direct recruitment qualifications of Diploma in Engineering. The court highlighted the extension of the pay scale to non-diploma holders and the application of the principle of equality under Article 14 of the Constitution of India.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners sought the upgraded pay scale of Rs.5000-8000/- for the post of Draughtsman Grade-II (Civil) w.e.f 01.01.1996 and its corresponding revised pay scale of Rs.9300-34800/- with Grade Pay of Rs.4200/- w.e.f 01.01.2006. The petitioners were possessing 3 years Diploma in Architecture and participated in the selection process in 2011. The Central Government had accepted the recommendation of the 6th Pay Commission and implemented it w.e.f. 01.01.2006.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioners were entitled to the revised pay scale as admissible to Charge Mechanics, and they were eligible for arrears from the date of filing the writ petition due to the respondent's silence despite judicial precedents. The court also noted that the petitioners were not entitled to interest on arrears.
Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioners, who were three years Diploma Holders in Engineering, were entitled to the revised pay scale as per the recommendations of the 6th Pay Commission, despite the alternative qualification of two years course of ITI for the post of Draughtsman Grade-II.
Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the principle of equality under Article 14 of the Constitution of India and considered the extension of the pay scale to non-diploma holders. It also emphasized the recommendations of the 6th Pay Commission, specifically Para 7.39.22 and Para 7.39.23, which recommended the pay scale upgrade for posts carrying minimum direct recruitment qualifications of Diploma in Engineering.
Final Decision: The court allowed the petition, stating that the petitioners were entitled to the pay scale as admissible to Charge Mechanics, and they were eligible for arrears from the date of filing the writ petition. The court clarified that the petitioners were not entitled to interest on arrears.
JUDGMENT :
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J.
1. The petitioners through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India are seeking direction to the respondents to grant upgraded pay scale of Rs.5000-8000/- for the purpose of pay fixation w.e.f 01.01.1996 and its corresponding revised pay scale of Rs.9300-34800/- with Grade Pay of Rs.4200/- w.e.f 01.01.2006 to the post of Draughtsman Grade-II (Civil).
2. The respondent in 2010 advertized different posts including post of Draughtsman Grade-II (Civil). The essential qualification prescribed for the post of Draughtsman Grade-II (Civil) was as below:-
Passed 03 years Certificate/Diploma in Architecture/Draughtsmanship from a recognized institution or equivalent.
OR
Possessing National Apprenticeship Certificate issued by National Council for Vocational Training, Government of India, Ministry of Labour
OR
Passed Diploma Course in Draughtsman Estimating and Design from College of Military Engineering, Pune
OR
Passed 2 year National Trade certificate for Draughtsman (Civil) and having one year practical experience in the trade.”
3. The petitioners were possessing 3 years Diploma in Architecture and they participated in the selection process. They came to be selected in 2011 and accordingly joined service. The Central Government has accepted recommendation of 6th Pay Commission and implemented it w.e.f. 01.01.2006. In the recommendations of Pay Commission, in Para No.7.39.22, it has been enjoined that posts of Overseer (Civil), Border Roads Organization, for which minimum qualification for direct recruitment is Diploma in Engineering, be merged with Superintendent BR Grade-II and be placed in the upgraded pay scale. The pay scale for the post of Overseer (Civil) as on 01.01.1986 was Rs.975-1540/- and on 01.01.1996 was Rs.3200-4900/-. The pay scale of Superintendent BR Grade-II was Rs.1400-2300/- w.e.f. 01.01.1986 and w.e.f. 01.01.1996 it was Rs.4500-7000/-. Both the posts were proposed to be merged and placed in upgraded pay scale of Rs.5000-8000/-. In the said paragraph, it was further provided that posts similarly placed and carrying minimum Diploma in Engineering should also be extended said pay scale. Para 7.39.22 of the recommendations reads as under:-
4. The Joint Director (Admn.) in its communication dated 13.05.2009 (Annexure P-3) has noted that case for upgradation of pay scale of Rs.5000-8000/- in respect of different categories of employees was forwarded to Secretary, BRDB, who in turn has suggested to forward a consolidated proposal. The relevant extracts of communication dated 13.05.2009 read as:
1. It is intimated that a case for upgradation of pay scale of Rs.5000-8000/- (Pre
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of employees to the revised pay scale as per the recommendations of the 6th Pay Commission, regardless of possessing alternative es....
Article 229 of the Constitution of India and the employees and staff members of the District Courts are governed by different rules. In the wake of above, they are entitled to higher grade pay-scale.
Important PointDifferent educational qualifications would not by itself be a criterion to deny equal pay for equal work to the employees otherwise similarly circumscribed.
Equal pay for equal work requires that similarly situated employees in the same cadre, regardless of timing of promotion, must receive the same benefits, reflecting non-discriminatory treatment under....
Employer's right to restructure cadre and rationalize pay scales, and the obligation to rectify pay anomalies caused by promotions.
Different pay scales for the same post are legally permissible if based on educational qualifications, provided there exists an intelligible differentia with a rational nexus to the objective of the ....
The court ruled that the absence of direct recruitment and differing duties between Chargeman(Communication) and Chargeman(Mechanic) precludes entitlement to the diploma scale of pay.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.