IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SANJAY V. GANGAPURWALA, P.D. AUDIKESAVALU, JJ.
The Justice Basheer Ahmed Sayeed College for Women (Autonomous) Rep. by its Correspondent Faizur Rahman Sayeed - Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Principal Secretary to the Government Department of Higher Educational, Chennai & Ors. - Respondents
W.A.No. 2353 of 2022 in W.P.No. 10973 of 2022
Decided On : 29-09-2023
Minority Institution - Religious Minority Status - Act 2004, Article 30(1) of the Constitution of India, G.O.Ms.No.270 dated 17.06.1998 - Act 2004, Article 15(5) of the Constitution of India, Tamil Nadu Backward Classes, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Reservation of Seats in Private Educational Institutions) Act, 2006 - The judgment discusses the grant of Minority status to educational institutions, the imposition of a threshold cap on admitting students from the Minority Community, and the regulatory measures that can be adopted by the Competent Authority to monitor the Minority status of an institution. It emphasizes that the Minority status is not for a limited period, social reservation need not be maintained by Minority Institutions, and the State Government can impose a threshold cap of admitting students from the Minority Community to 50%, while allowing Minority students to compete for the remaining 50% seats on merit.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant/petitioner, a Minority Institution, sought the extension of Religious Minority status and a Permanent Religious Minority status certificate. The State rejected the extension of Religious Minority status due to the institution admitting more than 50% of the Muslim Minority students during certain academic years. The appellant/petitioner challenged this decision.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the Minority status is not for a limited period, social reservation need not be maintained by Minority Institutions, and the State Government can impose a threshold cap of admitting students from the Minority Community to 50%. The court quashed the decision rejecting the extension of Religious Minority status and allowed the institution to function as a Minority Educational Institution, subject to compliance with other requirements.
Issues: The issues revolved around whether the Minority Status can be granted only for a limited period, whether social reservation has to be maintained by the Institutions administered and managed by Linguistic Minorities, and whether the State Government could impose a threshold cap of not admitting students from the concerned Minority Community beyond 50%.
Ratio Decidendi: The Minority status is not for a limited period, social reservation need not be maintained by Minority Institutions, and the State Government can impose a threshold cap of admitting students from the Minority Community to 50%. However, in the remaining 50% seats, filled on merit from the General Category, the students of the Minority Community can also compete and be admitted on merit and the same would not be counted in the 50% threshold cap meant for the Minority students.
Final Decision: The writ appeal and the writ petition stand partly allowed. The court quashed the decision rejecting the extension of Religious Minority status and allowed the institution to function as a Minority Educational Institution, subject to compliance with other requirements.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer in W.A.No.2353 of 2022: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 27.04.2022 in W.M.P.No.10533 of 2022 in W.P.No.10973 of 2022;
Prayer in W.P.No.10973 of 2022: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the first respondent Principal Secretary, Higher Education, Government of Tamil Nadu vide G.O.Ms.No.232, Higher Education (E1) Department dated 20.11.2021 rejecting extension of Religious Minority Status to the petitioner College and also consequently Clause 8(v) of G.O.Ms.No.270 Higher Education (J1) Department dated 17.06.1998, imposing the condition of restricting admission of minority students upto 50 percent to quash the same and further to direct the first respondent to issue the Permanent Religious Minority Status Certificate to the petitioner College.
[Prayer amended vide order dated 07.07.2023 in W.M.P.No.19308 of 2023 in W.P.No.10973 of 2022])
Common Judgment:
Sanjay V. Gangapurwala, CJ.
The appellant/petitioner, claiming to be a Minority Institution, filed W.P.No.10973 of 2022 assailing the Government Order dated 20.11.2021, rejecting the extension of Religious Minority status to the appellant/petitioner College and further sought a direction to issue the Permanent Religious Minority status certificate to the appellant/petitioner College.
2. The learned Single Judge ordered status quo to be maintained till the next date of hearing upon a condition that the appellant/petitioner faithfully adheres to the maximum threshold. But, the appellant/petitioner breaches the condition of maximum threshold of 50 percent students to be admitted from the Minorities. The W.A.No.2353 of 2022 is filed by the appellant/petitioner against the said order.
3. W.P.No.10971 of 2022 was initially filed by the appellant/petitioner challenging the G.O.Ms.No.232 dated 20.11.2021, rejecting the extension of Religious Minority status to the appellant/petitioner College. However, during the pendency of the writ petition, on or about 07.07.2023, the appellant/petitioner amended the petition by raising additional grounds, so also the prayer. By amendment, the appellant/petitioner now challenges Clause 8(v) of G.O.Ms.No.270, issued by the Higher Education (J1) Department dated 17.06.1998, imposing the condition of restricting the admission of Minority students up to 50 percent and also seeks a direction against the respondents to issue Permanent Religious Minority status certificate to the appellant/petitioner College.
4. As both the writ appeal and the writ petition are based on the same set of facts and involves similar question of law, to avoid rigmarole, are decided together.
5.1. The appellant/petitioner claims to be a Religious Minority Institution and runs an Arts & Science College (Autonomous) for Women. The appellant/petitioner claims to be a Society established and administered by the members of the Muslim Minority Community and is registered under the provisions of the erstwhile Societies Registration Act, 1860 on 23.10.2021 and after the repeal of the Act of 1860, it is now governed by the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975.
5.2. The appellant/petitioner College is affiliated to the University of Madras. The College became fully autonomous in the year 2006. It functions in two sessions viz., forenoon session and afternoon session. According to the appellant/petitioner, the forenoon session of the College receives grant-in-aid from the Government. The G.O.Ms.No.270 dated 17.06.1998 provides that in case of self-financing Educational Institutions imparting Professional Courses of Education, established and administered by any Minority, shall admit students of that Minority alone in the existing 50% of the sanctioned streng
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the State cannot impose a limit on the admission of students from the minority community to an unaided minority professional institution, as e....
Minority educational institutions can be established without prior permission, but the State may require a minimum percentage of admissions from the minority community to maintain their status.
The court affirmed that minority educational institutions must maintain a significant representation of students from the minority community to retain their status, and the state has the authority to....
The fixation of government seat quotas in unaided minority institutions is unconstitutional and violates their fundamental right to autonomy under Article 30(1) of the Constitution.
The right of minority educational institutions to administer admissions under Article 30(1) is subject to reasonable regulations by the State to maintain educational standards.
The Tamil Nadu State Minority Commission lacks authority to impose admission criteria on minority educational institutions, which are protected under Article 30 of the Constitution.
No Objection Certificate to run the minority educational institution can be granted either by the Competent Authority declared by the appropriate authority as per Section 10 or by the National Commis....
The state has the authority to regulate the qualifications and service conditions of teachers in minority institutions to ensure educational standards, and the identification of surplus teachers is a....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.